ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi 12C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 13, 2022 January 1, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 100.96 cm³ 113.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 204 g 192 g
Height 163.3 mm 168.8 mm
Width 73.6 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black
  • Mint Green
  • Graphite Gray
  • Ocean Blue
  • Lavender Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1116 x 2480 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 82.6 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.53 mAh/cm³ 44.06 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Xiaomi Redmi 12C. These two phones represent very different segments of the market, and the specifications highlight just how distinct their capabilities are.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed look at the key specifications, what they mean for you, and how the two phones stack up:

FeatureZTE Axon 40 UltraXiaomi Redmi 12CReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mmAxon 40 Ultra is more compact; Redmi 12C is taller, wider, and thicker, may feel bulkier in hand
Weight204g192gRedmi 12C is slightly lighter, though both are substantial
BuildStandardStandardStandard smartphone design for both
Display
Size6.8"6.71"Axon 40 Ultra slightly larger, differences are minimal for practical use
Resolution1116x2480720x1650Axon 40 Ultra’s display is significantly sharper, more detail
PPI400268Axon 40 Ultra has noticeably higher pixel density leading to more detailed text and images.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDAxon 40 Ultra has superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colours, and better energy efficiency with dark themes.
Refresh Rate120Hz60HzAxon 40 Ultra offers smoother scrolling and animations, better for gaming.
Brightness1500 nits0 nitsAxon 40 Ultra is much more visible outdoors in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1Helio G85Axon 40 Ultra has far greater processing power for demanding apps and tasks.
Antutu Score1,061,300225,154Axon 40 Ultra offers blazing fast performance, smoother gaming, and quicker multitasking.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G52 MC2Axon 40 Ultra's graphics are superior for gaming and graphically intensive applications.
Camera
Standard Camera64MP, f/1.650MP, f/1.8Axon 40 Ultra with higher detail, better low-light capability.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.05MPAxon 40 Ultra will produce clearer, higher-resolution self-portraits
Telephoto Lens64MP, f/3.5NoneAxon 40 Ultra provides optical zoom capabilities, capturing distant subjects in detail.
ToF 3D SensorYesNoneAxon 40 Ultra has better depth sensing for improved portrait mode.
Macro LensNone2MP, f/2.4Redmi 12C offers a basic macro lens for close-up shots.
Wide Angle + Macro64MP, f/2.3NoneAxon 40 Ultra has superior versatility for wide-angle shots and detailed close-ups.
Video8K@30fps1080p@30fpsAxon 40 Ultra can capture professional grade video quality
StabilizationEIS YesNoZTE Axon 40 Ultra video is more stable
DXoMark ScoresN/AMobile 45Redmi 12C has basic camera score
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar capacity, expected similar battery life.
Charging65W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingAxon 40 Ultra charges much faster, quickly getting you back in action.
Other
OSAndroid 12, Upgradable to 13Android 12Axon 40 Ultra will receive an update to android 13.
WiFiWiFi 6WiFi 5Axon 40 Ultra has a newer WiFi standard for faster, more reliable connection.
Bluetooth5.2 LE5.1 LEAxon 40 Ultra uses a newer, more efficient Bluetooth version.
GPSL1+L5L1Axon 40 Ultra offers better location accuracy with dual-band GPS.
SIMDual SIM, Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Dual SIM, Dual Standby (Micro SIM + Nano SIM)Axon 40 Ultra can use two sim cards simultaneously.
Storage128/256/512/1024 GB32/64/128 GBAxon 40 Ultra provides far more storage options, catering to media-heavy users.
RAM8/12/16/18 GB3/4/6 GBAxon 40 Ultra offers much smoother multi-tasking.
AudioDTS / DTS X, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesBasicAxon 40 Ultra provides far better sound quality and recording.
SecurityFingerprintFingerprintBoth offer basic biometric fingerprint sensors.
SensorsGyroscopeUltrasonic proximity virtualAxon 40 Ultra has gyroscope for better motion sensing.

2. Key Insights

  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: This is a flagship-level device designed for users who demand top-tier performance, excellent cameras, and a premium display. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset ensures smooth performance, and the impressive camera system provides a wide array of options. The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate makes the user experience incredibly fluid, and the 65W charging is very convenient.
  • Xiaomi Redmi 12C: This is an entry-level to mid-range phone focused on affordability. The Helio G85 chipset handles basic tasks reasonably well, and the camera system is adequate for everyday snapshots. The large battery is great for long usage, but it is let down by a low refresh rate and charging speed. The phone prioritizes price over performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:
    • Ideal User: Mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, power users who heavily use social media and video streaming, and professionals who require performance and multitasking.
    • Use Cases: 4K/8K video recording, heavy app usage, gaming, content creation, photography, and consuming high-resolution multimedia.
    • Recommendation: If you are looking for a premium experience and are willing to pay for it, the Axon 40 Ultra is an excellent option.
  • Xiaomi Redmi 12C:
    • Ideal User: Casual smartphone users who prioritize battery life and basic functionality over performance, and those with a limited budget.
    • Use Cases: Casual social media, web browsing, basic photography, music streaming, and calls.
    • Recommendation: If you need an affordable phone for basic tasks and don't want to break the bank, the Redmi 12C fits the bill.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. How important is performance and speed? If you need top-tier performance for gaming and heavy apps, choose the Axon 40 Ultra. If your usage is more basic, the Redmi 12C should be fine.
  2. What’s your primary use for the camera? If you need the best possible camera with advanced features, the Axon 40 Ultra is the clear winner. If you're only after basic snapshots, the Redmi 12C will suffice.
  3. What's your budget? The Axon 40 Ultra will be significantly more expensive than the Redmi 12C. If your budget is limited, the Redmi 12C is the more viable option.

Scenario Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Student on a Budget - Redmi 12C for affordability and basic needs.
  • Scenario 2: Photography Enthusiast - Axon 40 Ultra for its advanced camera features and image quality.
  • Scenario 3: Mobile Gamer - Axon 40 Ultra due to its high performance chipset and screen refresh rate.
  • Scenario 4: Senior User - Redmi 12C for simplicity and ease of use.

Final Thoughts and My Choice

Having looked at both of these phones and seeing just how different they are, it's clear that the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the phone that I would choose. This is not a dig at the Redmi 12C, as that phone has a different audience, but the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has so many incredible features. As someone who plays games and records video often, I would not be able to settle for anything less than what the Axon 40 Ultra has to offer.

The superior AMOLED display with the 120Hz refresh rate, combined with the flagship-level chipset and extensive storage and RAM options, just can't be ignored. The versatile camera system, especially its video capabilities with 8k and EIS, is excellent for what I do, and the faster charging will be useful for my busy lifestyle. While it comes at a higher cost, the Axon 40 Ultra would be a better fit for my needs and provide much more long term satisfaction.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.