ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco C40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 13, 2022 June 17, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 100.96 cm³ 119.52 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 204 g 204 g
Height 163.3 mm 169.6 mm
Width 73.6 mm 76.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1116 x 2480 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 82 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 400 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 133.26 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.53 mAh/cm³ 50.2 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) JLQ JR510 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MC1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's break down the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco C40, focusing on what these specs mean for you, the user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed comparison table highlighting the key specifications and their real-world implications:

FeatureZTE Axon 40 UltraXiaomi Poco C40Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm169.6 × 76.6 × 9.2 mmThe Poco C40 is noticeably larger and thicker, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight204g204gBoth are relatively heavy, but feel similar in hand.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphone designs.
Display
Size6.8"6.71"Both have large screens, but the Axon is slightly bigger.
Resolution1116x2480720x1650Axon’s higher resolution means sharper text and images.
Pixel Density (PPI)400268Axon display is much crisper than Poco.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDAxon offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast.
Refresh Rate120Hz60HzAxon has smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness1500 nits0 nitsAxon display is significantly brighter, much better for sunlight viewing.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1JLQ JR510Axon is much faster for apps, gaming, and multitasking.
AnTuTu Score1,061,300128,944Axon scores drastically higher, translating to noticeably faster performance.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MC1Axon has far superior graphics performance, essential for demanding games.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh6000mAhPoco has a larger battery, potentially longer battery life, but it needs to push less pixels.
Charging65W18WAxon charges significantly faster.
FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, 10W charger in box, Non-removablePoco can charge other devices and comes with charger.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.613MP, f/1.8Axon captures significantly more detailed and brighter photos.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.05MP, f/2.2Axon takes higher resolution selfies.
Telephoto Lens64MP, f/3.5NoneAxon offers optical zoom capabilities lacking in the Poco.
Wide/Macro Lens64MP, f/2.3NoneAxon has a wide-angle lens which can also take macro pictures.
ToF 3D Lens0.3MPNoneAxon has a ToF sensor which helps with depth sensing, mainly with AR apps and better portraits.
Depth LensNone2MP, f/2.4Poco can take portrait photos using this sensor, but Axon's main sensor can do a better job
VideoUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsAxon can record in much higher resolution, with more options.
StabilizationYesNoAxon offers electronic and optical stabilization while the poco offers no stabilization
Camera FeaturesExtensiveBasicAxon includes more modes like optical zoom, OIS, PDAF, Laser AF, etc.
Software
OSAndroid 12 (Upgradable to 13)Android 11Axon has a newer OS version, ensuring better compatibility and features.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWiFi 6Wi-Fi 5Axon supports faster Wi-Fi standard with better performance.
Bluetooth5.2 LE5.0 LEAxon has a newer version, more power efficient and stable.
GPSMore accurateBasicAxon supports more satelite systems for precise location.
Storage
Internal128GB/256GB/512GB/1TB32GB/64GBAxon offers significantly more storage options.
RAM8GB/12GB/16GB/18GB3GB/4GBAxon has considerably more RAM for smoother multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither support expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDTS / DTS X, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesBasic audio featuresAxon's audio quality is way better than the Poco C40
Security
Fingerprint SensorBasic fingerprintrear-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth are similar
Build
Screen ProtectionUnknownGorilla Glass 3Poco has better protection
Sensors
SensorsMore complexBasicAxon's sensor array is more versatile

2. Key Insights

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:

  • Strengths: It’s a powerhouse with a top-tier chipset, superior display, and advanced camera system. The 120Hz AMOLED screen is buttery smooth, and the under-display camera is a standout feature. The multiple 64MP cameras offer a lot of versatility for photography. The 65W charging is lightning fast.
  • Competitive Advantages: It’s a high-end phone that doesn't compromise on performance, display, or camera quality. It offers 8K recording which is perfect for video content creation.
  • Trade-offs: The battery is slightly smaller and the phone is expensive.

Xiaomi Poco C40:

  • Strengths: The Poco's main strength is its large 6000mAh battery, which will get you through days without needing a recharge. It also has a lower price.
  • Competitive Advantages: The large battery and reverse charging are useful for long periods without power.
  • Trade-offs: The display, performance, and camera are significantly inferior compared to the Axon. It uses an older operating system.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: Ideal for power users, gamers, and photography enthusiasts who want the best possible performance and features. It’s suitable for content creators who need the best video and photo capabilities and don't mind a higher price.
  • Xiaomi Poco C40: Best for users who prioritize battery life, need a basic smartphone for daily use, and have a lower budget. It's a good choice for those who need a secondary phone with long-lasting battery life or don't require heavy processing power or high-end cameras.

4. Buying Decision Framework

To help you decide, ask yourself these questions:

  1. Performance & Display: Do you need top-tier performance for gaming and demanding apps, or is basic performance sufficient for your needs?
  2. Camera Capabilities: Are you a photography enthusiast who values excellent photo and video quality, or are you mainly interested in basic snapshots?
  3. Battery Life and Budget: Do you need a device with exceptional battery life, or are you willing to sacrifice some battery life for better overall performance and features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamers: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the clear winner with its superior GPU, higher refresh rate screen, and processing power.
  • Travelers: If battery life is your primary concern, the Poco C40 is great, but you may be disappointed with its lack of camera options.
  • Content Creators: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra's high-end camera system, 8K video recording, and editing features will be invaluable.
  • Budget-Conscious Users: The Xiaomi Poco C40 offers basic smartphone functionality at a lower price, emphasizing battery life.
  • Everyday Use: If you prioritize a high quality screen and camera system, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is worth the investment.

My Pick

If I had to choose between the two, I would go with the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. Despite the smaller battery, the overall package is significantly superior. The AMOLED screen is beautiful, the cameras are top-notch, and the performance is blazingly fast. While the Poco C40's large battery is a plus, the massive gap in screen quality, processor speed, camera options, and overall user experience makes the Axon the clear winner in my book. The 65W charging also addresses most concerns with battery life. The Axon is a serious flagship phone, and I’d pick it any day for its premium experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.