Alright, let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A55. It's a classic battle of a 2022 flagship-level phone versus a more recent mid-ranger, and there are some really interesting contrasts to unpack. I'll break this down in a way that's clear, engaging, and, most importantly, practical for you.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed table breaking down the key technical differences and what they mean for you, the user:
Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A55 | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm | The Axon is taller and a hair thicker, while the A55 is wider. The Axon is slightly more compact for those with smaller hands and has slightly better ergonomics due to the small difference in width, but it comes down to personal preference. |
Weight | 204g | 213g | The Axon is a bit lighter, which may be noticeable during extended use, but both are in the normal weight for a smartphone of this size. |
Build Quality | Unknown | Gorilla Glass Victus | A55 has a higher degree of screen protection. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.8" | 6.6" | Axon has a slightly larger display, which is great for media consumption, gaming, and productivity. |
Resolution | 1116x2480 | 1080x2340 | The Axon’s higher resolution results in slightly crisper visuals. |
PPI | 400 | 390 | Both phones offer very similar pixel densities, making them sharp. The Axon is just a tad better in this area. |
Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both use the same excellent AMOLED technology, meaning vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the technology is different, so they are not the same screens. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Smooth scrolling and animations. The 120Hz refresh rates offer identical user experience |
Brightness | 1500 nits | 0 nits | Axon has a significantly higher peak brightness for better visibility in direct sunlight. The 0 nits reading for the A55 is incorrect, it is likely around 1000 nits. Still, this is a considerable difference, and the Axon would be much easier to see in direct sunlight. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Exynos 1480 | The Axon's Snapdragon is more powerful, offering snappier performance in demanding apps and games. The A55 is still powerful enough for most tasks. |
AnTuTu Score | 1,061,300 | 713,393 | The Axon has a significant performance advantage, indicating faster overall operation and better app loading, multitasking, and gaming. |
GPU | Adreno 730 | Xclipse 530 | Different GPUs mean different gaming performance characteristics, with the Adreno generally being better in most mobile games. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72", 0.7µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.0µm | Axon has higher resolution and a wider aperture, but the A55 has a larger sensor and larger individual pixels. This might make the A55 the better low-light performer, but the Axon has OIS to compensate. |
Selfie Camera | 16MP, f/2.0, 1.22µm | 32MP, f/2.2, 0.8µm | A55 has higher resolution but a smaller aperture and pixel size. |
Telephoto Camera | 64MP, f/3.5, 1/2", 0.7µm | None | The Axon boasts a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, a feature the A55 lacks. |
Wide Angle Lens | None | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12µm | The A55 boasts a dedicated wide angle lens. |
Macro Lens | None | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | The A55 boasts a dedicated macro lens. |
ToF 3D sensor | 0.3MP | None | The Axon has a depth sensor for better depth effects and potentially faster autofocus, though that is a weak sensor, so it may not matter. |
Wide Angle + Macro | 64MP, f/2.3, 1/1.72", 0.7µm | None | The Axon has a combination wide angle and macro lens. |
Video Recording | Up to 8K@30fps | Up to 4K@30fps | Axon can record higher-resolution video, appealing to content creators. |
DXOMark (Mobile) | Not Tested | 108 | A55 has a good score for a phone of this type. Without the score of the Axon, it is impossible to determine which one has the better camera. |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both have the same capacity, likely providing similar battery life. |
Charging | 65W | 25W | Axon offers much faster charging, which is a huge convenience. |
Software | Android 12 (up to 13) | Android 14 (up to 18) | The A55 is more up-to-date in terms of software and will receive longer-term support. |
Storage | 128/256/512/1024 GB | 128/256 GB | Axon offers more storage options, especially the very large 1TB. |
RAM | 8/12/16/18 GB | 8/12 GB | Axon has higher RAM options for better multitasking and performance. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 | Both devices support identical Wi-Fi standards. |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 | The Galaxy A55 comes with a newer Bluetooth standard, offering improved connectivity. |
SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM, eSIM | Both support Dual SIM and the A55 also features eSIM. |
2. Key Insights
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Strengths:
- Raw Power: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a significant performance boost, making the phone ideal for intensive tasks and gaming.
- Superior Display: A higher-resolution, larger display with better outdoor brightness.
- Versatile Camera System: Boasts a telephoto lens for optical zoom, which the A55 lacks.
- Fast Charging: The 65W charging is a game-changer for convenience.
- More Storage and RAM: More configuration options for storage and RAM.
Competitive Advantages:
- Provides an experience very similar to a flagship phone.
- Better for gamers and content creators.
Trade-offs/Limitations:
- Older software and a higher chance of slower updates, unless the user uses a custom ROM.
- Lacks the wide angle and macro cameras.
- No DXOMark results to compare camera scores with the A55.
Samsung Galaxy A55
Strengths:
- Modern Software: Runs on a newer version of Android with a better guarantee of long-term support and feature updates.
- More Versatile Camera System: Has a wide-angle and macro lens, useful for creative shots.
- Good DXOMark Score: Achieves a good score in the DXOMark mobile camera testing.
- Newer Bluetooth Standard: Comes with Bluetooth 5.3 for improved connectivity.
Competitive Advantages:
- Offers a balanced mix of features, suitable for a wide audience.
- Great for social media and daily usage.
- A well balanced phone with no major downsides.
Trade-offs/Limitations:
- Lower processing power compared to the Axon.
- Slower charging speed.
- Lower specs for people looking for more raw performance.
- A lesser display in terms of specs, though still very good.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
- ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Target Users: Power users, gamers, mobile photographers who prefer zooming and want flagship-level performance on a budget.
- Use Cases: Playing graphically intensive games, creating 8K video, capturing detailed images with optical zoom, long periods of use where quick top-ups are needed.
- Samsung Galaxy A55
- Target Users: Mainstream users who want a reliable phone with a solid camera and balanced features.
- Use Cases: Social media, general content creation, browsing, watching videos, taking a variety of photos in different situations, day-to-day life, long software support and updates.
4. Buying Decision Framework
To help you decide, consider these questions:
- What's your primary use case? If you need top-tier gaming or video editing capabilities, the Axon is the better option. If you want a reliable all-rounder, the A55 will do just fine.
- How important is software and long-term support? If you value long-term support, the A55 offers a clear advantage. If you are okay with not being updated as quickly, then the Axon is still a good option.
- Do you prioritize camera versatility or optical zoom? If you need wide angle and macro lenses, the A55 is the better choice. If optical zoom is more important to you, the Axon's telephoto lens is a major advantage.
Scenario-Based Recommendations
- The Gamer: Go for the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. The raw performance, higher refresh rate, and fast charging will enhance your gaming experience.
- The Social Media Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice, thanks to the wide-angle camera lens, newer software, and balanced feature set.
- The Budget Content Creator: If you're creating high-resolution video, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the way to go, thanks to its 8K video capabilities. If you are a general content creator, then the A55 would be the better option due to its well-balanced camera system.
- The Daily Driver: The Samsung Galaxy A55 offers a balanced experience that’s perfect for everyday use. Its reliable performance, excellent display, and great camera system make it the superior all-rounder.
My Choice
If I had to choose between these two, I would lean towards the Samsung Galaxy A55. The reason is not just that it’s a more modern device with a more comprehensive camera system, but also the long-term software support and the fact that it is a well-balanced phone with no major downsides. While the raw performance of the Axon is tempting, the A55 offers a better all-around experience for daily use, without any significant compromises. The more versatile camera is useful for everyday use, and the software support is key for a phone that can last years.