ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 13, 2022 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 100.96 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 204 g 180 g
Height 163.3 mm 161.5 mm
Width 73.6 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1116 x 2480 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.53 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Oppo Reno12 Pro. Both of these phones bring a lot to the table, but they target slightly different priorities. I'm going to break down the specs, explore the real-world impact, and help you figure out which one aligns better with your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed look at the key specs, along with what they mean for your daily usage:

FeatureZTE Axon 40 UltraOppo Reno12 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4 mmAxon is taller and thicker, Reno is wider and thinner. The Reno is more pocketable and a bit lighter.
Weight204g180gReno is noticeably lighter and more comfortable for prolonged usage.
BuildUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Reno has superior screen protection against scratches and accidental drops.
Display
Size6.8"6.7"Minimal size difference, both large displays for immersive content consumption.
Resolution1116 x 24801080 x 2412Axon has slightly sharper visuals due to a higher resolution, but the difference is likely marginal in everyday use.
Pixel Density (PPI)400394Both have excellent pixel density, resulting in clear and crisp visuals. The difference isn't noticeable to the naked eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDVibrant colors and deep blacks on both, offering a premium viewing experience.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both, enhancing the user experience.
Brightness1500 nits1400 nitsAxon is slightly brighter outdoors, offering better visibility under sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Mediatek Dimensity 7300 EnergyAxon offers significantly more processing power for demanding tasks and gaming. Reno is still fast for everyday tasks, but slower.
AnTuTu Score1,061,300702,140Axon has a substantial performance advantage, faster app loading, better multitasking, more suitable for gaming.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G615 MC2Axon's GPU offers better gaming performance.
Camera
Standard Lens64MP f/1.6, 1/1.72" Sony IMX78750MP f/1.8, 1/2" Sony LYT-600Axon's primary sensor is better for low-light and has higher resolution.
Selfie Camera16MP f/2.0, Omnivision, 1.22µm50MP f/2.0, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN5Reno's selfie camera offers much higher resolution.
Telephoto Lens64MP f/3.5, 1/2", Omnivision OV64B50MP f/2.0, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN5Axon has a slightly higher resolution and larger sensor, but Reno's has a wider aperture for better low-light performance
Wide Angle Lens64MP f/2.3, 1/1.72" Sony IMX7878MP f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX355Axon has a wide angle macro lens while Reno has only a wide angle lens. Reno has a lower resolution.
ToF 3D Sensor0.3 MP,Axon has a ToF sensor for depth mapping. Reno doesn't.
Video RecordingUp to 8K HDRUp to 4K HDRAxon offers higher video resolution, ideal for professional content creation.
Camera Features8K Video, Quadruple camera, Laser AF, Under Display Camera, Night ModeNoise Reduction, Triple camera, Continuous AFAxon has more advanced features, while Reno has continuous autofocus for sharper focus.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have similar battery capacity, suggesting similar battery life.
Charging65W Fast Charging80W Fast ChargingReno charges faster, minimizing downtime.
Software
OSAndroid 12, upgradeable to 13Android 14, upgradeable to 17Reno has a newer OS out of the box and supports more upgrades.
Connectivity
Bluetooth5.25.4Reno has the latest Bluetooth version, supporting higher quality audio codecs.
Storage
RAM8/12/16/18 GB12/16 GBAxon offers a max RAM of 18 GB compared to Reno's 16 GB. This is better for multitasking.
Internal Storage128/256/512/1024 GB256/512 GBAxon has more storage options, including a 1TB variant.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither supports storage expansion.
Audio
QualityDTS / DTS X, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesBasic audio featuresAxon offers enhanced surround sound and voice capture.

2. Key Insights

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:

  • Strengths:
    • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset offers significantly more processing power, making it ideal for demanding applications and high-end gaming.
    • Advanced Camera: It boasts a higher resolution main camera, a dedicated wide angle macro lens, and 8K video recording, offering more versatility for photography enthusiasts.
    • Larger Storage and RAM Options: More RAM for smooth multitasking and a 1TB storage option for massive files and media collections.
    • Enhanced Audio: Boasts DTS/ DTS X sound, stereo speakers and 3 microphones, which gives a great audio quality.
  • Competitive Advantage: It's the performance powerhouse with an emphasis on advanced photography features.
  • Trade-offs:
    • It's slightly bulkier and heavier than the Reno12 Pro, making it a bit less comfortable for extended use.
    • It also runs on an older Android version and has a basic fingerprint sensor and screen protection.

Oppo Reno12 Pro:

  • Strengths:
    • Sleek Design: It's thinner, lighter, and has a more modern look, making it more convenient for daily use.
    • Better Screen Protection: It is more resistant to scratches and drops.
    • Faster Charging: It charges slightly faster than the Axon, reducing the time needed to charge up.
    • Newer Software and Bluetooth: It ships with the latest Android and Bluetooth versions.
    • Strong Selfie Camera: It has a high resolution selfie camera.
  • Competitive Advantage: It prioritizes a sleek design, ease of use, and a high resolution front facing camera.
  • Trade-offs:
    • It has a weaker chipset that may struggle with intensive tasks and demanding games.
    • It has a lower resolution main sensor and has less camera features.
    • It has less RAM and storage options.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is best for:

  • Power Users and Gamers: Individuals who need top-tier performance for demanding games and resource-intensive applications.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those who want more versatile camera features, high-resolution sensors, and 8K video recording.
  • Users who prioritize performance and advanced features: Those who value peak performance and all the premium features a phone can offer.

Oppo Reno12 Pro is best for:

  • Everyday Users: Those who want a well-rounded phone with a beautiful design, a capable camera, and smooth performance.
  • Social Media Creators: Individuals who need high quality selfies and video.
  • Users who prefer a lighter and thinner design: Those who value portability and a sleek aesthetic.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to guide your choice:

  1. How important is top-tier performance for you?
    • If you're a gamer or a power user who needs the absolute best, go with the Axon 40 Ultra.
    • If you primarily use your phone for everyday tasks and aren't a heavy gamer, the Reno12 Pro will be fine.
  2. What is more important to you: photography or video?
    • If you prioritize diverse camera features, including 8K recording, and large sensors, the Axon is better for you.
    • If you need a high quality selfie camera or need a lighter device, the Reno is for you.
  3. How important is the latest software?
    • If you value having the most up-to-date Android version, the Reno12 Pro is a better fit.
    • If you don't mind having an older Android OS and focusing on specs, the Axon is better.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For Gamers/Power Users: Choose the Axon 40 Ultra for its superior performance and excellent gaming capabilities.
  • For Photography Enthusiasts: Choose the Axon 40 Ultra for the wide range of camera features and higher resolution sensor.
  • For Casual Users: Choose the Reno12 Pro for its sleeker design, more user-friendly feel, and solid everyday performance.
  • For Social Media Creators: Choose the Reno12 Pro for its sleek design and high resolution front facing camera.

My Choice

Personally, I would choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. As someone who appreciates having a performance-focused phone and loves experimenting with different camera capabilities, I would find it more compelling. The Axon's powerful processor, coupled with its versatile camera and the 8K video option, makes it perfect for my needs. While the Oppo is a great phone, for my specific use cases, the Axon’s capabilities provide better value. I prefer having a powerhouse in my pocket, and the Axon 40 Ultra delivers that.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.