ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 13, 2022 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 100.96 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 204 g 182 g
Height 163.3 mm 162.4 mm
Width 73.6 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1116 x 2480 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1500 nits 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.53 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Oppo Reno11. It's a classic matchup: a powerhouse from ZTE versus a stylish contender from Oppo. We'll break down the specs, explore real-world implications, and figure out which phone might be your best bet.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed breakdown of key specifications, focusing on what they mean for your everyday use:

FeatureZTE Axon 40 UltraOppo Reno11Real-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2022-05-132024-01-25The Reno11 is significantly newer, which typically means newer software and potentially improved technology.
Form FactorStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones, no foldables here.
Dimensions163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mmThe Axon is slightly taller and thicker, while the Reno11 is a bit wider but thinner. The Reno11 is generally more pocketable and feels slimmer in hand.
Weight204g182gThe Reno11 is noticeably lighter, which can make a big difference for long periods of use and for users that value ease of carrying.
Display
Size6.8"6.7"Both have large, immersive displays, though the Axon has a slight edge with its marginally larger size.
Resolution1116 x 24801080 x 2412The Axon offers a slightly sharper image thanks to its higher pixel count, though both are generally very crisp.
PPI400394Negligible difference in pixel density—both look equally sharp to the naked eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer the vibrant colors, deep blacks, and great contrast you expect from AMOLED.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness1500 nits1400 nitsThe Axon will be a bit more readable under direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm)MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6nm)The Axon has a more powerful flagship-level chipset, providing faster processing, better multitasking, and generally more grunt. The Reno11’s chipset is more mid-range, geared towards efficiency.
AnTuTu Score1,061,300923,559The Axon will outperform the Reno11 in benchmarks, but the practical impact will vary based on your usage.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G68 MC4The Axon has a more robust GPU, especially good for gamers.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh4800mAhA minor difference, with the Axon having a slightly larger battery. Both are generally good for a full day's use, but may require a top-up in high-use scenarios.
Charging65W67WThe Reno11 charges slightly faster than the Axon, so you can get back to full power a little quicker.
Battery FeaturesNon-removableNon-removableStandard for both.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72" Sensor50MP, f/1.88, 1/2" SensorThe Axon has a higher resolution, wider aperture, and larger sensor, generally leading to better low-light performance and detail.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.032MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" SensorThe Reno11 offers a higher-resolution selfie camera, but the Axon has a wider aperture which means better performance in low light conditions.
Telephoto Camera64MP, f/3.5, 1/2" Sensor32MP, f/2.0, 1/2.74" SensorThe Axon offers a higher resolution, while the Oppo has wider aperture.
Wide-Angle CameraNone8MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" SensorThe Reno11 has a dedicated wide-angle lens, a plus for capturing expansive scenes.
ToF 3D Sensor0.3MPNoneThe Axon has a ToF sensor for depth information, potentially improving portraits.
Wide-Angle + Macro Lens64MP, f/2.3, 1/1.72" SensorNoneThe Axon has a dedicated wide-angle + macro camera, a plus for capturing expansive scenes and close ups.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsThe Axon offers 8K recording, ideal for high-end video needs, while both offer EIS and slow-motion capabilities.
Camera Features8K, LAF, Under-display camTriple cam, Noise reduction, CAFThe Axon brings in niche features like 8K Video and Under-display camera and LAF; While the Oppo brings more user-focused additions like Triple Camera and Noise Reduction
Software
OSAndroid 12 (upgradable to 13)Android 14The Reno11 is on the latest Android version, bringing the newest features and security. The Axon is running an older version and might lack some of the benefits.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6Similar Wi-Fi capabilities for both phones.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.2 with APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AACBoth have the same version of Bluetooth, but Oppo brings additional features: APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC
GPSL1+L5, L1QZSSBoth offer similar GPS but have different additional GPS capabilities.
SIMDual SIMDual SIMBoth are Dual SIM capable.
Storage
Internal Storage128GB/256GB/512GB/1024GB256GB/512GBThe Axon offers more storage options, including a massive 1TB model, ideal for users with extensive media libraries.
RAM8GB/12GB/16GB/18GB8GB/12GBThe Axon offers more RAM at maximum capacity, which can further aid its multitasking capabilities.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither supports microSD cards, so choose your storage wisely.
Audio
QualityDTS/DTS:X, Stereo speakersBasic AudioThe Axon has better audio output and features, ideal for those who value sound quality.
Security
FeaturesFingerprintFingerprintBoth offer basic fingerprint security.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownUnknownBoth have similar screen protection technology.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Gyro, Accelerometer, HallFingerprint, Proximity, Gyro, Accelerometer, GeomagneticSimilar features, plus the Axon has a hall sensor while Oppo has a Geomagnetic sensor.

2. Key Insights

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:

  • Strengths:
    • Performance Beast: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset gives the Axon a significant edge in raw power, making it better for gaming, demanding applications, and heavy multitasking.
    • Superior Camera (Overall): A higher resolution main sensor, wider aperture, better telephoto camera and a very capable dedicated wide + macro lens mean it's a great camera system, particularly excelling in low light photography and video recording (with the advantage of 8K recording).
    • More Storage and RAM Options: More RAM and a 1TB storage option cater to power users who need the very best.
    • Enhanced Audio: DTS:X support and stereo speakers make for a more immersive audio experience.
  • Trade-offs:
    • Older Software: The Android 12 base is quite old now, and might miss out on the benefits of newer Android features.
    • Bulkier and Heavier: Not as slim and light as the Oppo.
  • Competitive Advantage: Offers higher resolution and overall improved camera system, superior performance, and more storage options.

Oppo Reno11:

  • Strengths:
    • Sleeker Design: Slimmer, lighter, and more comfortable to hold and carry.
    • Newer Software: Runs the latest version of Android, meaning up-to-date features and security.
    • Good Selfie Camera: Higher resolution selfie camera that will capture all the details of your face.
    • Faster Charging: Slightly faster charging to quickly top up the battery.
    • Wide Angle Lens: Dedicated wide angle lens means this phone can capture wide group shots that the Axon cannot.
  • Trade-offs:
    • Mid-Range Performance: The Dimensity 7050 chipset is not as powerful as the Axon's, which might be limiting for demanding users.
    • Basic Audio System: Standard audio output, without any enhanced features.
    • Average Main Camera: A good system, but slightly worse performance in low light.
  • Competitive Advantage: Offers a stylish design, newer software, faster charging, a wide-angle lens, and a better selfie camera, as well as being more comfortable to hold.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • For the Power User (Gamers, Content Creators):

    • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the better fit. Its powerful processor, more RAM, and superior camera system make it ideal for gaming, video editing, and any resource-intensive task. The 8K video recording and impressive main camera are a boon for content creation.
  • For the Stylish All-Rounder (Everyday User):

    • Oppo Reno11 is the more compelling choice. Its sleek design, lightweight build, and good enough camera are great for everyday use.
  • For the User Focused on Software Experience:

    • Oppo Reno11 with it's newer software is better, giving users a more up-to-date software experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. Performance or Style?
    • Do you prioritize the fastest performance and most versatile camera system (ZTE) or a slimmer design and an easier-to-handle phone (Oppo)?
  2. Do You Need the Best Possible Camera System?
    • The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is far better suited for a user who wants the best photo quality from their phone. However, if you want a dedicated wide-angle lens, the Oppo is for you.
  3. Is the latest software a priority?
    • If you want the latest version of Android, the Oppo is for you.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • "I'm a mobile gamer and want the best possible performance:" Choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra for its powerful Snapdragon chipset and superior graphics.
  • "I take a lot of photos, especially in low light:" The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra excels in low-light photography and offers the versatility you need.
  • "I prioritize a sleek design and up-to-date features:" The Oppo Reno11 is the better pick, offering a more modern software experience in a lighter package.

My Choice

If I were to choose between these two phones, I'd lean towards the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. Here's why:

As someone who values high-performance and loves a truly capable camera system, the Axon 40 Ultra wins. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a significant advantage for any resource-intensive tasks I might need to do. Although the software is slightly older, the raw performance, superior camera system and larger storage options all make the trade-off worthwhile. While the Oppo Reno11 is a very competent phone, the Axon 40 Ultra's extra features and sheer grunt, will make it a better fit for me.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.