ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs Motorola Moto G82 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 13, 2022 June 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 100.96 cm³ 95.9 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.82 "/g
Weight 204 g 173 g
Height 163.3 mm 160.9 mm
Width 73.6 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black
  • Meteorite Gray
  • White Lily

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1116 x 2480 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 87.7 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.53 mAh/cm³ 52.14 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive deep into the specifications of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Motorola Moto G82, breaking down what each phone brings to the table and, more importantly, how they stack up in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed comparison table, focusing not just on specs, but what they mean for you:

FeatureZTE Axon 40 UltraMotorola Moto G82Real-World Implications
Design
Size163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mmAxon is slightly larger and thicker, might feel more substantial in hand
Weight204g173gMoto G82 is significantly lighter, better for long use; Axon more dense.
Display
Size6.8"6.6"Axon has a larger screen, better for media consumption; slight difference
Resolution1116x24801080x2400Axon’s higher resolution means slightly sharper images; not a huge difference
Pixel Density400 PPI402 PPIBoth are very similar in clarity; minimal difference
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks; excellent viewing experience
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations; responsiveness is similar.
Brightness1500 nits0 nitsAxon is significantly better in bright sunlight, much easier to read outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1Snapdragon 695 5GAxon has a much faster processor, better for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
AnTuTu Score1,061,300390,000Axon is significantly faster across the board; noticeable difference.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 619Axon has a more powerful GPU, better for graphics-intensive games.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72"50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76"Axon’s larger sensor & wider aperture should capture more light, perform better in low-light.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.016MP, f/2.2Axon's wider aperture means better selfie quality, especially in less than ideal lighting.
Telephoto64MP, f/3.5, 1/2"NoneAxon has dedicated zoom capabilities, can get much closer to subjects without loss in quality.
Wide AngleNone8MP, f/2.2Moto has a dedicated ultrawide lens for landscape, group photos, & such.
ToF 3D Sensor0.3MPNoneAxon has a time of flight sensor which aids in better depth detection
Macro LensNone2MP, f/2.4Moto can take close-up photos of small subjects, can offer creativity.
Wide Angle + Macro64MP, f/2.3, 1/1.72"NoneAxon has great ultra wide capabilities and macro; more capable camera.
VideoUp to 8KUp to 1080pAxon can record much higher resolution videos, great for content creators.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth should offer similar battery life, given the identical capacity.
Charging65W30WAxon charges significantly faster; less time plugged in.
Software
OSAndroid 12Android 12Both have Android 12, upgradeable to 13.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5Axon has faster Wi-Fi standard; less latency, more reliable in crowded areas.
Bluetooth5.25.1Axon has a slightly more recent standard, marginal improvement.
Storage
Internal128/256/512/1024GB128 GBAxon has more storage options to save all your files and media; great for media hoarders.
RAM8/12/16/18 GB6 GBAxon has significantly more RAM, allowing for smoother multitasking and resource-intensive applications
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither can take expandable storage, limiting storage space
Audio
QualityDTS/DTS X, Stereo Speakers, 3 MicsDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 MicsZTE Axon offers better surround sound and voice capture than the Moto G82.
Security
Fingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedMotorola offers easier to use and faster fingerprint sensor
Sensors
SensorsMultiple sensorsMultiple sensorsBoth have extensive sensors. Motorola is better for gaming, ZTE better for general use.

2. Key Insights

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • Strengths: The Axon 40 Ultra is a powerhouse, boasting a flagship-level processor, significantly better display brightness, and a more advanced camera system, particularly in video. It offers faster charging and more advanced audio features.
  • Competitive Advantages: The processing power, display brightness, and superior camera versatility with its zoom and ultrawide capabilities make it a great option for creative people.
  • Trade-offs: It’s heavier and larger than the Moto G82, and the fingerprint sensor is less advanced.

Motorola Moto G82

  • Strengths: The Moto G82 is lightweight, has great ultrawide and macro lenses, and features an easier-to-use side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Competitive Advantages: It’s more comfortable for prolonged use and may appeal to budget-conscious users looking for a good mid-range option. It is also better for gamers due to its sensors.
  • Trade-offs: Its performance is not close to the Axon 40 Ultra’s, especially in gaming and intensive tasks. The display brightness is insufficient in bright environments and the main camera is not as capable.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • Ideal For:
    • Tech enthusiasts who demand top performance.
    • Content creators who need excellent video recording capabilities and versatility.
    • Users who prioritize screen quality and need the best visibility in bright sunlight.
    • Gamers and power users seeking a no-compromise experience.
  • Use Cases:
    • Editing high-resolution videos on the go.
    • Playing demanding games at high settings.
    • Consuming media outdoors in sunny conditions.
    • Capturing high-quality photos and videos in various scenarios.

Motorola Moto G82

  • Ideal For:
    • Budget-conscious users looking for a reliable device for daily use.
    • Users who prefer lighter, more comfortable phones.
    • Those who value a reliable camera system and do not care much for high performance.
    • Gamers seeking a lightweight phone.
  • Use Cases:
    • Everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and communication.
    • Taking casual photos of friends, family, and landscapes.
    • Moderate gaming and media consumption.
    • People who want basic phone functionality.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three key questions to help you decide:

  1. Do you need the best possible performance?
    • If yes, the Axon 40 Ultra is the clear winner due to its superior processor and graphics capabilities.
  2. How much do you value screen brightness and outdoor visibility?
    • If it is important, the Axon 40 Ultra's 1500 nits is a must-have for those frequently using their phones in sunny conditions.
  3. Is having the best cameras a priority?
    • If yes, the Axon 40 Ultra has the lead in almost all aspects of camera performance.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For the Power User: If you want the most powerful phone for gaming, heavy multitasking, and media creation, choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra.
  • For the Budget-Conscious User: If you are looking for a reliable mid-range device that performs well for typical daily use with a great camera system, choose the Motorola Moto G82.
  • For the Outdoor Enthusiast: If you often use your phone outdoors in bright conditions and want to see the screen without a struggle, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the better choice due to its brighter display.

My Choice

Personally, I would choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. The deciding factors for me are its vastly superior performance, the impressive display brightness that makes using the phone outdoors a breeze, and the excellent camera system that provides versatility for content creation and high quality photos and videos. While it is a bit bulkier and heavier, the performance and features outweigh the size and weight for me. Plus, the fast charging is a major convenience. The camera quality is also something I value a lot.

Although the Moto G82 has its merits, especially for its price and lighter build, the Axon 40 Ultra offers a more significant leap in performance and overall capabilities that align with my daily needs and preferences as someone who appreciates and uses the phone to its full extent, including writing reviews and taking pictures.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.