ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 13, 2022 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 100.96 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 204 g 171 g
Height 163.3 mm 154.1 mm
Width 73.6 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1116 x 2480 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.53 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 19

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's break down the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and Motorola Edge 50 Neo, putting a tech-savvy yet practical lens on their specifications.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed look at the key differences between these two phones, focusing on what they mean for you, the user:

FeatureZTE Axon 40 UltraMotorola Edge 50 NeoReal-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2022-05-132024-08-29Motorola is significantly newer, benefiting from recent tech advances.
Form FactorStandardStandardBoth are typical smartphones.
Dimensions163.3x73.6x8.4 mm154.1x71.2x8.1 mmAxon is noticeably larger, might feel bulkier in hand.
Weight204g171gEdge 50 Neo is much lighter, better for extended use.
Display
Size6.8"6.4"Axon has a larger display, better for media consumption.
Resolution1116x24801256x2760Edge 50 Neo has a sharper display.
Pixel Density (PPI)400474Edge 50 Neo screen is significantly more crisp.
TechnologyAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth use excellent display tech, differences are minor.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness1500 nits3000 nitsEdge 50 Neo is much better in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1Dimensity 7300Axon has a significantly more powerful chip for gaming, heavy tasks.
AnTuTu Score1,061,300675,000Axon performs much faster in benchmarks, indicating snappier performance.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G615 MC2Axon has the better GPU for gaming and graphics heavy tasks.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4310mAhAxon has a larger battery, likely better battery life.
Charging65W68WBoth offer fast charging. Edge 50 Neo is slightly faster.
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removable, 15W Wireless ChargingEdge 50 Neo offers wireless charging for convenience.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72"50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56"Axon has a higher resolution, Edge 50 Neo a bigger sensor for low light performance.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.032MP, f/2.2Edge 50 Neo takes higher resolution selfies.
Telephoto Lens64MP, f/3.5, 1/2"10MP, f/2.0Axon has a much higher resolution telephoto, but Edge 50 Neo has a wider aperture.
ToF 3D SensorYesNoAxon has an extra sensor for depth mapping.
Wide/Macro64MP, f/2.3, 1/1.72"13MP, f/2.2Axon has a much higher resolution wide-angle, Edge 50 Neo has slightly wider aperture.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsAxon offers a higher video resolution, better for professional use.
Video StabilizationYesNoAxon utilizes Yes while Motorola does not, which could lead to more stable video.
DxOMark Mobile ScoreNot tested115Motorola's camera is tested and it has a good score.
Software
OSAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 14 (up to 19)Edge 50 Neo has the newer OS and promises more updates.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6, MIMOWiFi 6EEdge 50 Neo has newer Wi-Fi, better in congested areas. Axon supports MIMO.
Bluetooth5.25.0Axon has a newer Bluetooth version.
GPSL1+L5, GLONASS (L1)Standard GPSAxon has more precise GPS tracking.
SIMDual SIMDual SIM + eSIMEdge 50 Neo offers eSIM for travel convenience.
Storage & RAM
Internal Storage128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1024GB256GB, 512GBAxon has more storage options including 1TB model.
RAM8GB, 12GB, 16GB, 18GB8GB, 12GBAxon has more RAM options including 18 GB, better for multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNo expandable storage for both.
Audio
QualityDTS/DTS:X, 3 MicsDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersAxon features DTS/DTS:X and has better voice capture, Edge 50 Neo has Dolby Atmos.
Security
FeaturesBasic FingerprintBasic FingerprintStandard fingerprint readers.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownGorilla Glass 3Edge 50 Neo has better screen protection.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Gravity, HallFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeAxon also has Gravity and Hall sensor, Edge 50 Neo also has a compass sensor

2. Key Insights

  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: This phone is a powerhouse. Its standout features include a more powerful Snapdragon chipset, a versatile camera system with higher resolutions across the board (including 8k video recording), and a larger battery. However, it’s heavier and bulkier, and it lacks wireless charging and the latest OS out of the box.

  • Motorola Edge 50 Neo: The Edge 50 Neo prioritizes user experience with its lightweight design, higher resolution and brighter display, wireless charging, and the latest Android version, while having a tested camera system. It's designed for modern users who appreciate portability, great display and convenience. However, its chipset is significantly less powerful than the Axon.

Key Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. User Experience: If you're a power user (gamer, heavy multitasker), the Axon 40 Ultra's superior chipset is a big win. However, if you value a lightweight phone with a more modern OS and better screen visibility in bright light, the Edge 50 Neo is the way to go.
  • Camera vs. Practicality: The Axon offers better versatility with higher resolution sensors, including the telephoto lens. But, the Edge 50 Neo is tested by DxOMark and it may be sufficient for most average users.
  • Battery Life vs. Convenience: The Axon likely has better battery life, but the Edge 50 Neo makes up for it with wireless charging.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:

    • Ideal For: Gamers, content creators, professionals who demand top-tier processing power and camera versatility.
    • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, 4K/8K video recording, editing, heavy multitasking, users who need a powerful camera with many features.
    • Recommendation: If raw power and advanced camera features are your priorities, and you don't mind a bulkier phone, the Axon 40 Ultra is a clear choice.
  • Motorola Edge 50 Neo:

    • Ideal For: Everyday users who appreciate a balanced smartphone experience, great display, and a sleek, lightweight design.
    • Use Cases: Casual gaming, social media, browsing, photography, users who prioritize portability and a better display.
    • Recommendation: If you value a lighter phone with a vivid display, wireless charging, and the latest Android version, the Edge 50 Neo is the better option.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three key questions to ask yourself to decide:

  1. How much do I value raw performance? If gaming and heavy multitasking are critical for you, the Axon 40 Ultra's chipset will deliver significantly better performance. However, if you use it for social media, streaming, etc the Edge 50 Neo is probably enough.

  2. What is my priority regarding display? Do you prefer a larger display for consuming media, or a sharper and brighter display for better visibility under sunlight? The Axon has the larger screen, but the Edge 50 Neo's display is more crisp and brighter.

  3. Do I prefer having a very versatile camera, or a more balanced phone with great overall camera performance and other more modern features like wireless charging? The Axon boasts a greater camera versatility, however, the Edge 50 Neo is a more well-rounded phone that will satisfy the needs of most users.

Scenario Recommendations:

  • Power User Scenario: If you’re frequently running demanding apps or playing graphics-intensive games, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the clear winner for its performance.
  • Everyday User Scenario: For typical smartphone tasks with a preference for a lighter device, great display, and modern features, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo fits the bill.
  • Camera Enthusiast Scenario: If having a lot of camera features and a versatile telephoto is important to you then the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is better. If you just need a good camera, then the Edge 50 Neo is still very suitable.
  • Traveler Scenario: If you are a frequent traveler, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo will be a more convenient choice, since it's lighter and more modern, and offers eSIM.

Final Thoughts - What Would I Choose and Why?

Personally, I would choose the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Here's why:

While the Axon 40 Ultra is undeniably a beast in terms of raw power, it's a bit overkill for my daily use. I value a phone that is convenient, lightweight and easy to use on a daily basis. As someone who does not play graphic-intensive games on my mobile, the performance of the Edge 50 Neo would be more than enough. I also enjoy having a crisp display with high visibility outdoors.

The Edge 50 Neo also provides wireless charging and a more modern software experience right out of the box, and the latest version of android and promised software upgrades are very important to me as well, meaning that this phone will be usable for longer. For these reasons, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is the best option for me.

In the end, the "best" phone is subjective, and it depends on your use case and personal preference, but for me, the Edge 50 Neo has more advantages.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.