ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 14 Plus - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 13, 2022 October 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 100.96 cm³ 97.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 204 g 203 g
Height 163.3 mm 160.8 mm
Width 73.6 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black
  • Red
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Purple
  • Starlight
  • Midnight

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1116 x 2480 1284 x 2778
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 87.8 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 458 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1500 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 96.30 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.53 mAh/cm³ 44.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4323 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Hexa-core (2x3.23 GHz Avalanche + 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard)
GPU Adreno 730 Apple GPU (5-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG Lightning 2.0

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 12 16
Maximum OS Version 13 18

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Apple iPhone 14 Plus. These are two very different beasts, and understanding their strengths and weaknesses is crucial for making the right choice. I'll break it all down for you as if we were chatting over coffee – tech details and all!

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a comprehensive look at the specs, with a special focus on how they translate into real-world experiences:

FeatureZTE Axon 40 UltraApple iPhone 14 PlusReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm160.8 x 78.1 x 7.8 mmZTE is taller and thicker, iPhone is wider. Pocket-feel will differ significantly.
Weight204g203gBoth are similar, slightly heavy for extended use.
Display
Size6.8"6.7"Minor difference. Both offer large screens for content consumption.
Resolution1116 x 24801284 x 2778iPhone has higher resolution for sharper images and text.
Pixel Density (PPI)400458iPhone displays will appear sharper with better detail.
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast.
Refresh Rate120Hz60HzZTE will feel noticeably smoother when scrolling, playing games.
Brightness1500 nits1200 nitsZTE will be more legible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm)A15 Bionic (5nm)Different architectures. iPhone has better performance according to benchmarks, but ZTE is also very performant.
AnTuTu Score1,061,3001,330,312iPhone appears to be faster overall in daily use and intensive tasks.
GPUAdreno 730Apple 5-core GPUDifferent architectures mean varied performance. iPhone is generally faster, but both are powerful.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72", 0.7µm12MP, f/1.5, 1/1.66", 1.9µmZTE boasts more megapixels, but iPhone has larger pixel size for better light capture.
Front Camera16MP, f/2.0, 1.22µm12MP, f/1.9, pixel size unknownZTE has a higher resolution selfie camera. iPhone has a wider aperture.
Telephoto Lens64MP, f/3.5, 1/2", 0.7µmNoneZTE offers optical zoom capabilities.
Wide Angle LensNone12MP, f/2.4, 1/2.55", 1.4µmiPhone provides ultrawide versatility for group shots.
ToF 3D Sensor0.3MPNoneZTE has depth mapping for potentially better portrait mode.
Wide Angle + Macro64MP, f/2.3, 1/1.72", 0.7µmNoneZTE has wide-angle and macro capabilities in one camera.
Video8K@30, 4K@120, EIS4K@60, 1080@240, OISZTE can capture in 8K and up to 120FPS in 4k; iPhone has good image stabilization features, and has great quality despite not having 8k.
DxOMark (Main)Not Tested133iPhone is tested, and has a high rating.
DxOMark (Selfie)Not Tested144iPhone is tested, and has a high rating.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh4325mAhZTE has a larger battery, potentially offering longer usage times.
Charging65W Fast Charging15W MagSafe, 7.5 QiZTE has vastly superior fast charging. iPhone has wireless charging but no fast wired charging support.
Other
Operating SystemAndroid 12, up to 13iOS 16, up to 18iOS offers a tight ecosystem and consistent experience. Android is more open and customizable.
Internal Storage128/256/512/1024 GB128/256/512 GBZTE offers higher storage configurations.
RAM8/12/16/18 GB6 GBZTE offers a higher amount of RAM, improving multitasking

2. Key Insights

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • Strengths:
    • Display: The 120Hz refresh rate and superior brightness are a treat for the eyes.
    • Cameras: The triple 64MP setup (Main, Telephoto, Wide + Macro) and under-display front camera are unique and versatile for photography.
    • Battery: Larger battery and incredibly fast 65W charging.
    • Storage: Higher RAM options and storage capacities for heavy users.
  • Competitive Advantages:
    • The under-display camera offers a true full-screen experience.
    • Versatile camera system with a wide range of lens options.
    • Faster wired charging.
  • Trade-offs/Limitations:
    • Slightly thicker and taller design, and heavy.
    • Might lack the polish of iOS in terms of software experience.
    • Not as fast as the iPhone in benchmarks.
    • No official testing by DxOMark.

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

  • Strengths:
    • Performance: The A15 Bionic chip is a performance beast.
    • Display: Sharp, vibrant, and accurate with great outdoor visibility.
    • Cameras: Despite lower megapixels, its image quality is still top-tier, with a very good software for handling images.
    • Ecosystem: Seamless integration with other Apple devices and services.
  • Competitive Advantages:
    • Superior app loading speed and smoother multitasking.
    • Optimized iOS software experience, with long-term support.
    • Premium build quality and brand recognition.
    • Tested by DxOMark with a great score.
  • Trade-offs/Limitations:
    • 60Hz display may feel less smooth than the ZTE.
    • Slower charging compared to the ZTE and no charger in the box.
    • Lower battery capacity.
    • Lacks a dedicated telephoto camera.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • Best Suited For:
    • Tech enthusiasts and power users who love to push their devices to the limit.
    • Gamers who appreciate higher refresh rates and fast charging.
    • Photography lovers who desire a versatile lens system.
    • Users who prefer more freedom and customizability from Android.
    • People who want a true full-screen experience with no camera cutout.

Apple iPhone 14 Plus

  • Best Suited For:
    • Users deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem.
    • People who prioritize performance, reliability, and ease of use.
    • Those who prefer simplicity and great integrated apps.
    • Casual photographers who want great quality in a reliable and user-friendly device.
    • Users who appreciate a seamless experience across devices.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three key questions to guide your choice:

  1. Do you value a seamless ecosystem or prefer open customizability? If you're invested in the Apple ecosystem, the iPhone is a no-brainer. If you prefer Android's freedom and customizability, the ZTE is a solid choice.
  2. How important are fast charging and a 120Hz refresh rate? If you want top-tier fast charging and smoother visuals, the ZTE is your champion. If you don't mind the slower charging, the iPhone is still a good option.
  3. How much do you rely on optical zoom or wide angle cameras? If you prioritize versatile lenses with optical zoom and more flexibility with a macro camera, the ZTE is the better option. If an ultrawide is what you need, and you prefer a great integration with software for great image quality, then the iPhone takes the lead.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The Mobile Gamer: The ZTE's 120Hz display and fast charging make it a better pick.
  • The Photographer: The ZTE offers more flexibility, while the iPhone excels in image processing.
  • The Average User: The iPhone may feel more seamless and intuitive for everyday tasks.
  • The Power User: The ZTE is a great choice for someone who wants more RAM and storage.
  • The Budget-Conscious Buyer: Both phones are premium devices, but the price-to-value ratio may differ depending on current promotions and your region.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I’d lean towards the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. The sheer versatility of the camera system, combined with the silky-smooth 120Hz display and ultra-fast charging, is too compelling. As a tech enthusiast, I appreciate the full-screen experience of the under-display camera and the power-user-focused features like expanded RAM and storage. The trade-offs, like a slightly less polished software experience and no wireless charging are compromises I am willing to make for the features that really matter to me. I also use more android devices and enjoy the freedom that the OS gives me.

Both phones have a place, but for me, the Axon 40 Ultra offers a more compelling mix of cutting-edge technology, unique features, and raw power.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.