Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 10, 2024 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 91.83 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.82 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 174.5 g 213 g
Height 161.1 mm 161.1 mm
Width 75 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Ocean Teal
  • Graphite black (Stealth Black)
  • Prism Gold
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.45 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 18

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond a simple spec comparison. I aim to provide a holistic view, incorporating market trends, technological ecosystems, and future implications.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping:

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 13Samsung Galaxy A55Technological ContextCategory
Launch Date2024-01-102024-03-15Indicates market timing and potential access to newer software updates.Innovation Potential
Price RangeLowMediumReflects target market segment and expected feature set.User Experience
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm)Exynos 1480 (4 nm)Impacts performance, power efficiency, and overall device capabilities. 4nm generally indicates superior efficiency.Performance Metrics
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Determines processing power; A78 cores in A55 suggest better multi-core performance.Performance Metrics
GPUMali-G57 MC2Xclipse 530Influences graphics performance; Xclipse 530 is expected to deliver stronger gaming and visual experiences.Performance Metrics
DisplayAMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nitsSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nitsBoth offer smooth visuals and bright outdoor visibility. Super AMOLED generally offers better color accuracy and contrast.User Experience
OSAndroid 13Android 14Newer OS version in A55 provides latest features and potentially longer security support.Ecosystem Integration
OS Max Version1618Longer software update commitment suggests better long-term value.Innovation Potential
Camera (Video)1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsSignificantly better video recording capabilities on the A55, catering to content creators.User Experience
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhComparable battery capacities suggest similar battery life.User Experience
Weight/Dimensions174.5g, 161.1x75x7.6mm213g, 161.1x77.4x8.2mmRedmi Note 13 is significantly lighter and slightly thinner.User Experience
SensorsFingerprint (side)Fingerprint (under display)Under-display fingerprint sensors are generally perceived as more premium.User Experience

2. Strategic Technological Insights:

  • Processor Technology: The Exynos 1480's 4nm process node gives the A55 an edge in power efficiency and potentially performance. This reflects the industry trend toward smaller, more efficient chipsets.
  • Display Technology: While both devices feature impressive displays, "Super AMOLED" generally indicates higher quality in terms of color reproduction and contrast, suggesting Samsung's focus on visual experience.
  • Software Updates: Samsung's commitment to longer software updates (Android 18) highlights a strategic advantage in terms of security and feature longevity, crucial for long-term user satisfaction.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment:

  • Xiaomi: Caters to budget-conscious users prioritizing value and performance. Aligns with a broader ecosystem of affordable smart devices.
  • Samsung: Targets users prioritizing a premium experience, longer software support, and integration with the Samsung ecosystem (e.g., Galaxy Watch, Buds).

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework:

  • Performance Longevity: The A55's more advanced processor node suggests better sustained performance over time.
  • Software Support: The extended software support for the A55 indicates a device that will remain relevant for a longer period.
  • Resale Value: The combination of Samsung's brand recognition and longer software updates generally leads to better resale value.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Redmi Note 13 offers excellent value, the Galaxy A55's superior processor, longer software support, better camera capabilities, and potential for higher resale value make it a more compelling choice for my needs. The slightly higher price is justified by the long-term benefits and overall user experience. The commitment to future-proofing through software updates aligns with my preference for sustainable technology choices. Although the Redmi Note 13 is lighter, the in-display fingerprint sensor and potential for superior visual experience on the A55 sway my decision.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.