Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 21, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.69 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 187 g 179 g
Height 161.2 mm 161.6 mm
Width 74.2 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Arctic White
  • Olive Green
  • Aurora Purple (Coral Purple)
  • Ocean Teal
  • Scarlet Red
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.64 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.3 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProMotorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.2 x 74.2 x 8 mm161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1 mmVirtually identical in size and feel.
Weight187g179gMoto G55 is slightly lighter, but the difference is negligible.
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedPreference-based; under-display feels more modern, side-mounted can be faster and more reliable.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 120HzRedmi's AMOLED offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially brighter highlights. More vibrant and power-efficient.
Size6.67"6.49"Redmi offers a slightly larger viewing area.
Resolution1220 x 2712 (446 ppi)1080 x 2400 (405 ppi)Redmi's sharper display offers more detail in text and images.
Peak Brightness1800 nitsNot specifiedRedmi's significantly higher peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. The lack of data for the Moto G55 makes a direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (6nm)Snapdragon generally offers better GPU performance and efficiency. Performance differences may be noticeable in demanding games.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x1.95 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)While the Moto G55 has a slightly higher clock speed on its performance cores, the Snapdragon's architecture and overall configuration likely result in smoother performance.
RAM/StorageMultiple Options (up to 12GB/512GB)8GB/256GBRedmi offers more RAM and storage options for power users and those needing more space.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps1080p@60fpsRedmi allows for higher resolution and slow-motion video recording. Lack of detailed camera specs limits comprehensive comparison.
Battery
Capacity5100 mAh5000 mAhNegligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14Moto G55 ships with a newer Android version out-of-the-box. However, Redmi is likely to receive updates to newer versions.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Redmi Note 13 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with higher resolution, brightness, and vibrant colors. Noticeably better visual experience.
  • Potentially Better Performance: Snapdragon chipset generally offers better gaming and overall performance.
  • More Versatile Camera: Higher resolution video recording capabilities.
  • More RAM and Storage Options: Caters to a wider range of user needs.

Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 14, potentially offering newer features and longer software support timeframe.
  • Slightly Lighter: Marginally lighter, but unlikely to be a significant factor in daily use.

Trade-offs:

  • Moto G55: Compromises on display quality and potentially performance for a newer Android version and slightly lower weight.
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro: May require waiting for Android 14 update.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Redmi Note 13 Pro: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera features. Ideal for multimedia consumption, gaming, and content creation.

Moto G55: Users who prioritize having the latest Android version and a slightly lighter phone. Suitable for general everyday use, social media, and light gaming. Price sensitive buyers prioritizing value.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is display quality? A vibrant and sharp display significantly enhances media consumption and overall user experience.
  2. What is your budget and storage requirement? The Redmi offers various configurations to cater to different budgets and storage needs.
  3. Do you prioritize the latest Android version or performance/features? While Android 14 offers potential advantages, the Redmi might offer better long-term performance.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro

Reasoning: The superior AMOLED display, potentially better performance from the Snapdragon chipset, and more versatile camera significantly outweigh the Moto G55's advantage of having Android 14 out-of-the-box. I value the improved visual experience and potential performance gains for gaming and demanding tasks. While software updates are important, the Redmi's hardware advantages are more compelling in the long run. Additionally, the wider RAM/Storage options allow me to choose a configuration that fits my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.