Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Motorola Moto G04s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 21, 2023 April 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.69 cm³ 97.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 187 g 178.8 g
Height 161.2 mm 163.5 mm
Width 74.2 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Arctic White
  • Olive Green
  • Aurora Purple (Coral Purple)
  • Ocean Teal
  • Scarlet Red
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Sea Green
  • Concord Black
  • Satin Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.64 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.3 mAh/cm³ 51.31 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProMotorola Moto G04sPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.2 x 74.2 x 8163.5 x 74.5 x 8Virtually identical in size and feel
Weight (g)187178.8Negligible weight difference in daily use
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedPreference-based; both are reliable
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 68B colors, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzSignificantly better contrast, colors, and smoothness on the Redmi Note 13 Pro
Resolution1220 x 2712720 x 1612Much sharper and more detailed visuals on the Redmi Note 13 Pro
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzSmoother animations and scrolling on the Redmi Note 13 Pro
Peak Brightness (nits)1800Not specifiedRedmi Note 13 Pro should be far more visible in direct sunlight; Missing Moto G04s data limits full comparison
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Significantly faster and more power-efficient performance on the Redmi Note 13 Pro
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x1.95 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Noticeably better performance for demanding tasks and multitasking on the Redmi Note 13 Pro
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G57 MP1Much stronger gaming and graphics performance on the Redmi Note 13 Pro
RAM/Storage8/256GB, 12/256GB, 12/512GB4/128GBMore RAM and storage options provide flexibility and future-proofing on the Redmi Note 13 Pro
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps1080p@30fpsRedmi Note 13 Pro offers higher resolution and slow-motion video recordingMissing detailed camera specs for both phones prevent in-depth comparison.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51005000Similar battery life expected, though Redmi's superior efficiency might extend its usage

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly better display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, higher refresh rate, and peak brightness deliver a superior visual experience.
  • Much more powerful performance: The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 outclasses the Unisoc T606, enabling smoother multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications.
  • More versatile camera: 4K video recording and 120fps slow-motion offer more creative options.
  • More RAM and Storage options: Provides flexibility for different needs and better future-proofing.

Motorola Moto G04s Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While not specified, Motorola's G series typically targets a more budget-conscious market.
  • Latest Android OS: Ships with Android 14, offering potentially longer software support.

Trade-offs: The Redmi Note 13 Pro's superior features come at a likely higher price. The Moto G04s prioritizes affordability but compromises on performance and display quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Redmi Note 13 Pro: Users who prioritize a vibrant display, smooth performance, strong gaming capabilities, and versatile camera features. Suitable for content consumption, mobile gaming, and photography enthusiasts.

Moto G04s: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality, such as calling, texting, web browsing, and social media. Ideal for light users who don't demand high performance or advanced features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi Note 13 Pro will likely be more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Gaming, photography, and media consumption benefit from the Redmi's superior hardware.
  3. How important is display quality? The AMOLED display on the Redmi Note 13 Pro is a significant advantage.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user: Redmi Note 13 Pro
  • Budget-conscious light user: Moto G04s
  • Gamer/Photographer/Content Consumer: Redmi Note 13 Pro

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro

Reasoning: While pricing is a significant factor and unknown for the Moto G04s, the substantial performance and display advantages of the Redmi Note 13 Pro make it the clear winner for me. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, coupled with the high refresh rate AMOLED display, would provide a significantly more enjoyable and responsive user experience. The versatility offered by the camera features and larger RAM/storage configurations further solidifies its appeal for long-term use. The Moto G04s, while potentially more affordable, compromises too heavily on key areas that significantly impact daily usage. A sharper, smoother, and more powerful phone is worth the price premium for most users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.