Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 21, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.69 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 187 g 174.9 g
Height 161.2 mm 161.9 mm
Width 74.2 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Arctic White
  • Olive Green
  • Aurora Purple (Coral Purple)
  • Ocean Teal
  • Scarlet Red
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1800 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.64 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.3 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Adreno 710 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProMotorola Edge 50 FusionPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.2 x 74.2 x 8 mm161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mmVirtually identical in size; negligible real-world difference.
Weight187g174.9gRedmi is noticeably heavier; might impact one-handed use for some.
Display
Size6.67"6.7"Negligible size difference.
TypeAMOLED, 68B colorsP-OLED, 1B colorsBoth offer vibrant colors; AMOLED generally has deeper blacks. Redmi's 68B color support offers a wider color gamut, but the discernable difference for average users is minimal.
Resolution1220 x 2712 (FHD+)1080 x 2400 (FHD+)Redmi has a sharper display due to higher pixel density (446 ppi vs 393 ppi). Noticeable in text clarity and image sharpness.
Refresh Rate120Hz120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT)Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. 144Hz on the Motorola (International version) provides a slightly smoother experience in supported content but may consume more battery.
Peak Brightness1800 nits1600 nitsRedmi offers better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)Identical performance; both handle day-to-day tasks and moderate gaming well.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Identical CPU performance.
GPUAdreno 710Adreno 710Identical GPU performance.
RAM/Storage8GB/256GB, 12GB/256GB, 12GB/512GB8GB/256GBRedmi offers more RAM options for potentially better multitasking. More storage options on the Redmi cater to users with high storage demands.
Battery
Capacity5100 mAh5000 mAhNegligible difference in battery life; real-world usage will vary more based on individual habits.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14Motorola launches with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. Redmi will likely receive updates to Android 14 and potentially beyond.
CameraNot enough information provided for detailed comparison.Not enough information provided for detailed comparison.N/A

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution leads to noticeable improvements in clarity.
  • Brighter Display: Better visibility in direct sunlight.
  • More RAM/Storage Options: Caters to power users and those with higher storage needs.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
  • Newer Android Version: Potential feature and security advantages, but Redmi is likely to receive updates.
  • Potentially Higher Refresh Rate (International): Smoother experience in supported content.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro: Users who prioritize display quality, need ample storage, and value multitasking capabilities. Suitable for media consumption, gaming, and productivity.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Users who prioritize a lightweight phone, prefer the latest software, and value a smooth display. Suitable for general use, social media, and light gaming. International users benefit from the 144Hz refresh rate.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display sharpness and brightness?
  2. Do you need a lot of storage or RAM?
  3. Is having the latest Android version at launch a priority?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Prioritize media consumption: Redmi Note 13 Pro due to its superior display.
  • Limited budget and prefer latest OS: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion.
  • Heavy multitasking and need large storage: Redmi Note 13 Pro.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro

While both phones are closely matched, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's superior display is the deciding factor for me. The sharper resolution and higher brightness significantly enhance the viewing experience, which is crucial for media consumption, gaming, and even everyday tasks. The additional RAM and storage options also provide future-proofing and flexibility. While the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion offers a newer Android version and lighter weight, these advantages don't outweigh the Redmi's display benefits in my personal use case. I often consume media and value a crisp, bright screen. The slight weight difference is acceptable considering the noticeable gain in visual quality.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.