Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 15, 2024 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 98.16 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.54 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 171 g
Height 162.3 mm 154.1 mm
Width 75.6 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Ocean Sunset
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1800 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.94 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 19

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G vs. Motorola Edge 50 Neo: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer in terms of real-world performance.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GMotorola Edge 50 NeoReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions162.3 x 75.6 x 8mm154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1mmEdge 50 Neo is slightly more compact and potentially easier to handle.
Weight188.5g171gEdge 50 Neo is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size6.67"6.4"Redmi Note 13 offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzpOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations, but pOLED generally offers better color accuracy and deeper blacks.
Resolution1080 x 24001256 x 2760Edge 50 Neo boasts a sharper display with higher pixel density.
Peak Brightness1800 nits3000 nitsEdge 50 Neo will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 685 (6nm)Dimensity 7300 (4nm)Edge 50 Neo's Dimensity 7300 provides a significant performance advantage in speed and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Edge 50 Neo features more powerful CPU cores, leading to smoother multitasking and faster app launches.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G615 MC2Edge 50 Neo's GPU offers better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM8GB12GBMore RAM in the Edge 50 Neo allows for seamless multitasking and smoother performance with demanding apps.
Storage128/256GB512GBEdge 50 Neo offers significantly more storage space for apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4310 mAhRedmi Note 13 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14Edge 50 Neo ships with the latest Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages.

2. Key Insights

The Motorola Edge 50 Neo emerges as the clear winner in terms of performance, display quality, and overall user experience. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset, coupled with 12GB of RAM, delivers a significant performance advantage over the Redmi Note 13's Snapdragon 685. The brighter, sharper pOLED display on the Edge 50 Neo provides a more visually appealing experience.

However, the Redmi Note 13 4G boasts a larger battery, potentially translating to longer usage time between charges. This could be a deciding factor for users who prioritize battery endurance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Power Users & Gamers: The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is the better choice for demanding users who need a responsive device for gaming, multitasking, and content creation. The superior processing power, sharper display, and larger RAM capacity cater to a more demanding workload.

  • Budget-Conscious Users & Battery Life Champions: If battery life is paramount and budget is a constraint, the Redmi Note 13 4G presents a compelling option. Its larger battery and lower price point may appeal to users who prioritize endurance over raw performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Redmi Note 13 4G is likely to be more affordable.
  • What are your primary use cases? For gaming and demanding tasks, choose the Edge 50 Neo. For basic usage and long battery life, the Redmi Note 13 might suffice.
  • How important is display quality? The Edge 50 Neo offers a superior visual experience.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

While the Redmi Note 13 4G has a larger battery, the performance and display advantages of the Motorola Edge 50 Neo are too significant to ignore. As someone who values a smooth, responsive user experience and a vibrant display, the Edge 50 Neo aligns better with my needs. The Dimensity 7300's significant performance leap, coupled with ample RAM and storage, ensures the phone will handle demanding tasks and remain future-proof for longer. The superior screen quality enhances everyday interactions, from browsing to media consumption. While battery life is important, I'd rather carry a power bank than compromise on performance and visual fidelity. The Edge 50 Neo offers a more well-rounded package for a modern smartphone user.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.