Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 26, 2023 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.71 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.65 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 176 g 184.5 g
Height 159.9 mm 170.8 mm
Width 73.9 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Ice Blue
  • Onyx Black
  • Pearl Green
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.5 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.24 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12SMotorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1170.8 x 74 x 7Razr 40 Ultra is significantly thinner when folded but taller and slightly wider when unfolded.
Weight (g)176184.5Negligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableNoYesRazr's foldable design offers portability and a unique form factor but introduces potential durability concerns.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.436.9Razr offers a larger main screen for immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2640Similar sharpness due to comparable pixel density.
Display TypeAMOLED, 90HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 165HzRazr boasts a higher refresh rate (smoother animations) and LTPO for potentially better power efficiency. Foldable screen technology may impact image quality and durability.
Peak Brightness (nits)10001400Razr offers significantly better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G96 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Razr significantly outperforms in processing power, enabling smoother multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Razr's CPU architecture is significantly more powerful and efficient.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 730Razr offers substantially better graphics performance for gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM6GB/8GB8GB/12GBRazr offers more RAM in its higher-end configurations, improving multitasking capabilities.
Camera
Main Camera108MP12MPRedmi Note 12S boasts higher megapixel count, but image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and other factors; Razr's camera might perform better in low light due to the wider aperture (f/1.5 vs f/1.8)
Selfie Camera16MP32MPRazr has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fpsRazr offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh3800 mAhRedmi Note 12S offers significantly longer battery life.
OS UpdatesAndroid 13, future updates unclearAndroid 13, guaranteed updates up to Android 16Razr offers longer software support and more OS updates.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Advantages:

  • Significantly longer battery life: The 5000mAh battery provides extended usage time.
  • Lower price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful performance: Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a flagship-level experience.
  • Foldable design: Offers portability and a unique user experience.
  • Higher refresh rate display: Smoother scrolling and animations with the 165Hz display.
  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Longer software support: Guaranteed updates to Android 16.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and basic smartphone functionality.
  • Use Cases: Everyday tasks, social media, web browsing, casual photography.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a cutting-edge device with a unique foldable design, powerful performance, and a premium display. Willing to compromise on battery life for portability.
  • Use Cases: Demanding applications, mobile gaming, content creation, multitasking, users valuing portability and style.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi Note 12S offers excellent value for its price, while the Razr 40 Ultra is a premium device.
  2. How important is battery life? The Redmi Note 12S significantly outlasts the Razr 40 Ultra.
  3. Do you value a foldable design and top-tier performance? The Razr 40 Ultra delivers in these areas.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

While the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S offers incredible value and battery life, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. The significantly improved performance, smoother display, and the innovative foldable design are compelling. I prioritize performance and the unique form factor outweighs the battery life trade-off for me. The longer software support also ensures a longer usable lifespan for the device. While the price is higher, the Razr 40 Ultra offers a premium experience that justifies the cost for my needs. I am willing to carry a portable charger to mitigate the reduced battery capacity.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.