Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 11, 2023 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 101.13 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 188 g 184.5 g
Height 165.9 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76.2 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Frosted Green
  • Matte Black
  • Mystique Blue
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.44 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. We'll dissect the specs, translate the tech jargon into real-world implications, and figure out which phone might be the better fit for different users.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed comparison table breaking down the key specs and their real-world implications:

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12Motorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2023-01-112023-06-05Razr 40 Ultra is newer, with potentially more up-to-date features.
Form FactorStandardFoldableRazr offers unique foldable design; Redmi has traditional form factor.
Dimensions165.9 × 76.2 × 8 mm170.8 × 74 × 7 mmRazr is slightly taller, thinner, and narrower when unfolded; overall similar size.
Weight188g184.5gNegligible weight difference; both feel relatively similar in-hand.
Display
Size6.67"6.9"Razr has a slightly larger screen for immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2640Razr offers marginally sharper visuals with slightly higher pixel count.
PPI395413Similar pixel density; both provide crisp, clear images.
TechnologyAMOLEDN/ARedmi's AMOLED gives richer colors, deeper blacks and better power efficiency. Razr technology is not specified but is likely OLED.
Refresh Rate120Hz165HzRazr offers smoother scrolling and animations for a more fluid experience.
Brightness1200 nits1400 nitsRazr has better outdoor visibility in bright conditions.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 4 Gen 1Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Razr provides significantly faster performance for gaming, multitasking, and overall snappiness.
AnTuTu Score460,8001,238,000Razr is far faster with better app loading and gaming capabilities.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 730Razr offers a much more capable GPU for demanding graphics tasks.
Camera
Rear Main Camera48MP (f/1.8)12MP (f/1.5)Redmi has higher resolution; Razr has a wider aperture for better low-light.
Selfie Camera13MP (f/2.45)32MP (f/2.45)Razr's selfie camera captures more detail.
Wide Angle Lens8MP (f/2.2)N/ARedmi offers more versatile photography with a dedicated wide-angle lens.
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.4)N/ARedmi offers a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots.
Wide Angle + MacroN/A13MP (f/2.2)Razr offers a combined wide-angle/macro lens.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@60fpsRazr can record in much higher quality and has more options such as HDR, EIS.
DXOMark Mobile Score69 (Photo: 74, Video: 49)N/ARedmi provides the only available testing metric, which is mediocre compared to the market.
Camera FeaturesMultipleMultipleRazr offers features like OIS, LAF, Time-Lapse and Night Vision, Redmi features include Night Mode, Continuous and Manual Focus.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh3800mAhRedmi has a much larger battery; better potential for longer battery life.
Charging33W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingRedmi charges slightly faster, but not a big difference.
FeaturesNon-removableWireless 8W, Reverse ChargingRazr has wireless charging and can charge other devices wirelessly.
Software
Operating SystemAndroid 12Android 13 (up to 16)Razr comes with a newer version of Android and is confirmed to receive more updates.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11acWiFi 6ERazr supports a newer WiFi standard for faster, more reliable connections.
Bluetooth5.15.3Razr offers a more recent Bluetooth version with potential speed and efficiency improvements.
GPSMultiple SystemsMultiple SystemsSimilar features overall, Redmi includes more satellite systems.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM / eSIMRazr has added eSIM support for flexibility in carrier options.
Storage
Internal Storage128GB/256GB256GB/512GBRazr offers double the max storage.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB8GB/12GBRazr has significantly more RAM.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither device offers external storage options.
Audio
Audio QualityBasicDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 micsRazr provides a superior experience with enhanced audio.
Security
BiometricSide FingerprintSide FingerprintBoth have side-mounted fingerprint sensors.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 3Gorilla Glass VictusRazr has the best screen protection available.
SensorsMultiple SystemsMultiple SystemsBoth have basic sensors, Redmi has Ultrasonic proximity while Razr has standard Proximity and Gravity.

2. Key Insights

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12:

  • Strengths:

    • Excellent Battery Life: The 5000mAh battery is a significant advantage, promising longer usage time between charges.
    • Versatile Camera System: Includes a dedicated wide-angle and macro lens, offering more flexibility for different shooting scenarios.
    • Affordable: Typically positioned as a budget-friendly option, offering a lot of features for the price.
    • AMOLED display: Offers better colors, blacks and power efficiency.
  • Trade-offs/Limitations:

    • Less Powerful Performance: The Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 is much less powerful than the Razr's chip, leading to a less fluid experience in heavy tasks and gaming.
    • Older Android Version: Ships with Android 12, while the Razr has Android 13.
    • Basic Audio: Does not have high-end audio features.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra:

  • Strengths:

    • Top-Tier Performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers exceptional speed and fluidity for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
    • Foldable Innovation: The unique design provides a compact form factor with the usability of a large display.
    • Premium Display: The 165Hz refresh rate and higher brightness provide a smoother and more vivid visual experience.
    • Enhanced Audio Features: Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones greatly enhance the audio experience.
    • Newer Software: Features a more up-to-date operating system, and is confirmed to have more software updates.
    • Advanced Connectivity: Supports the latest WiFi and Bluetooth versions.
  • Trade-offs/Limitations:

    • Shorter Battery Life: The smaller 3800mAh battery is a significant disadvantage.
    • Less Versatile Camera: Lacks a dedicated wide-angle lens (but makes up for it with a macro+wide angle), the main camera also has lower resolution compared to the Redmi.
    • Higher Price: It is expected to cost more than the Redmi due to its premium features and foldable design.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 is best suited for:

  • Budget-conscious users: Those seeking good value and essential smartphone features without breaking the bank.
  • Users prioritizing battery life: People who need a phone that can last a full day or more with heavy usage.
  • Casual photographers: Those who appreciate a versatile camera with wide-angle and macro capabilities.
  • Media consumers: People who are looking for a good overall device with a good screen for media consumption.

Use Cases:

  • Daily browsing, social media, and communication.
  • Long trips without reliable access to charging.
  • Capturing photos and videos in a variety of settings.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is best suited for:

  • Tech enthusiasts and early adopters: Those eager to experience cutting-edge innovation and a unique design.
  • Power users: Those who require a high-performance device for demanding apps, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Users who prioritize display quality: Those seeking a smooth, vibrant, and immersive visual experience.
  • Users who value high-quality audio: Those seeking enhanced spatial audio for media and calls.

Use Cases:

  • Mobile gaming and resource-intensive apps.
  • Multitasking across multiple apps seamlessly.
  • Experiencing enhanced audio with Dolby Atmos and Stereo Speakers.
  • Showcasing an advanced and innovative device with a compact form factor.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help users decide between these phones:

  1. How important is battery life to you? If you need a device that can reliably last a full day or more, the Redmi Note 12 is likely the better choice. If you value top performance more and don't mind charging more often, the Razr is better.
  2. What is your primary use case for your phone? If you're a casual user with a focus on photography, and battery life, the Redmi should suffice. If you're a power user, gaming enthusiast, or tech enthusiast who desires the best performance, the Razr will be more satisfying.
  3. What is your budget? If you are budget conscious, then the Redmi is the clear choice. If you're willing to pay a premium for innovation and high performance, the Razr is the way to go.

Scenario-based recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: A student with a limited budget needs a phone for daily use and social media. Recommendation: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 for its good value, battery life and versatility.
  • Scenario 2: A mobile gamer who enjoys multitasking requires top-tier performance. Recommendation: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra for its raw performance and a high refresh rate screen.
  • Scenario 3: A professional wants a reliable device with high-quality audio and advanced connectivity. Recommendation: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra for its advanced features, high quality audio, and cutting-edge connectivity.

Personal Choice

If I were choosing between these two devices, I would pick the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Here’s why:

As a tech journalist, I highly value innovation, cutting-edge features, and top-tier performance. The Razr 40 Ultra delivers on all these fronts. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chip provides unmatched speed and responsiveness, making it ideal for heavy multitasking and demanding games. The foldable form factor isn't just a gimmick; it offers a unique and compact way to handle a large screen device. The 165Hz refresh rate and higher brightness enhance the visual experience, while the enhanced audio features with Dolby Atmos ensure high quality media consumption. While the battery life is a concern, I'm okay with charging more frequently to enjoy such a premium and innovative device. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra represents the pinnacle of modern smartphone technology.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.