Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 1, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 110.19 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 208.4 g 209 g
Height 162.9 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Obsidian Black
  • Iceberg Blue
  • Trend edition
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.8 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.38 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 14 18

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ and the Samsung Galaxy A35, two compelling mid-range contenders, to see which phone truly delivers. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to uncover what these numbers mean for your daily life.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+Samsung Galaxy A35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.9 x 76 x 8.9161.7 x 78 x 8.2Redmi is slightly taller and narrower. A35 is a tad thinner. Negligible differences in hand feel.
Weight (g)208.4209Virtually identical weight; both should feel comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialsGlass front/backUnspecifiedRedmi's glass build likely feels more premium, though potentially more fragile. A35's material impacts durability and feel.
Display
Display TypeOLEDSuper AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Super AMOLED generally boasts slightly better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible size difference; both provide ample screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Nearly identical resolutions, resulting in sharp visuals on both.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, enhancing responsiveness.
HDRDolby Vision, HDR10+None SpecifiedRedmi's superior HDR support translates to a significantly richer viewing experience for compatible content.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080Exynos 1380Exynos 1380, built on a 5nm process, likely offers better performance and power efficiency than the 6nm Dimensity 1080.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)A35's CPU configuration suggests potentially better multi-core performance for demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G68 MP5A35's MP5 variant of the Mali-G68 GPU likely provides a slight edge in graphics performance.
RAM8GB6/8GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking, though 8GB on the Redmi provides more headroom for future-proofing.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)20050Redmi boasts significantly higher megapixel count. However, sensor size and other factors play a crucial role in image quality.
DxOMark Score113104Redmi scores higher in DxOMark tests, indicating potentially better overall camera performance.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities suggest similar potential battery life, though real-world usage will vary based on optimization.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts a higher megapixel count on its main camera, the Samsung Galaxy A35's Exynos 1380 processor, built on a more advanced 5nm process, likely delivers superior overall performance and efficiency.
  • Display: Both phones feature 120Hz AMOLED displays for smooth visuals. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ pulls ahead with its support for Dolby Vision and HDR10+, offering a noticeably better viewing experience for HDR content. This is a major differentiator for media consumption.
  • Camera: Megapixels aren't everything. While the Redmi has a 200MP sensor, the A35 uses a Samsung GN8 sensor known for good low-light performance. The DxOMark scores suggest the Redmi might have a slight edge overall, but real-world results could vary.
  • Software and Updates: The Galaxy A35, being a newer release (2024 vs. 2022), will likely receive longer software updates and security patches from Samsung, a significant advantage in the long run.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Redmi Note 12 Pro+: Best suited for users who prioritize a vibrant display for media consumption and value a high-megapixel camera. It's a strong contender for mobile photographers and videographers who want good hardware at a competitive price.
  • Samsung Galaxy A35: Ideal for users who prioritize overall performance, longevity (thanks to longer software support), and a reliable user experience. It's a great choice for those who want a balanced phone that excels in daily tasks and gaming.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. How important is display quality for watching videos? If HDR is a must-have, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is the clear winner.
  2. Do you prioritize long-term software updates? The Samsung Galaxy A35 will likely receive more updates, making it a better long-term investment.
  3. What's your budget and storage needs? Compare pricing for similar storage configurations to determine the best value.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s display and camera specs are tempting, I'd choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. The more efficient processor, slightly better GPU, and the promise of longer software updates are crucial factors for me. I value a phone that performs consistently well in everyday tasks and remains up-to-date with security patches. While the Redmi's screen is undeniably impressive for media, the A35's overall package provides a more future-proof and reliable experience, making it the smarter choice in my opinion. Additionally, the under-display fingerprint sensor feels more modern than the side-mounted one on the Redmi.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.