Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 1, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 110.19 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 208.4 g 189 g
Height 162.9 mm 171.4 mm
Width 76 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Arctic White
  • Obsidian Black
  • Iceberg Blue
  • Trend edition
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.8 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.38 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 14 17

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, dissecting their specifications and translating them into real-world experiences.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+Motorola Razr 50 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.9 x 76 x 8.9171.4 x 74 x 7.1Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more compact when folded, enhancing portability. However, it's taller and slightly wider when unfolded.
Weight (g)208.4189Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter, crucial for a foldable phone carried in pockets.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 Ultra's foldable design offers a unique form factor and pocketability but introduces potential durability concerns and a price premium.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.9Razr 50 Ultra offers a slightly larger main screen for immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2640Razr 50 Ultra boasts a slightly higher resolution, but the difference in sharpness will be minimal at these screen sizes.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120165Razr 50 Ultra's higher refresh rate will deliver smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming and fast-paced UI interactions.
Display TypeOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr's foldable pOLED introduces a crease and potential durability concerns but enables the compact form factor.
Peak Brightness900 nits3000 nitsRazr 50 Ultra's significantly higher peak brightness ensures exceptional outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Razr 50 Ultra features a significantly more powerful chipset, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2.6 GHz A78)Octa-core (3.0 GHz X4)Razr 50 Ultra's newer and faster CPU architecture provides a substantial performance advantage.
RAM (GB)8/1212Both offer ample RAM for multitasking, but the Razr's 12GB ensures smoother performance with demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)20050Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts a higher megapixel count, but Razr utilizes a larger sensor, potentially resulting in better low-light performance.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50004000Redmi Note 12 Pro+ packs a larger battery, likely leading to longer battery life.

2. Key Insights

The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ prioritizes affordability and long battery life. Its 200MP camera and fast charging are standout features. However, its performance lags behind the Razr 50 Ultra.

The Razr 50 Ultra is a premium foldable phone offering top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and the unique convenience of its form factor. However, it comes with a higher price tag and potential durability concerns associated with foldable screens. The smaller battery capacity might also be a concern for power users.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Redmi Note 12 Pro+: Ideal for budget-conscious users, photography enthusiasts seeking high megapixel counts, and those prioritizing battery life.

Razr 50 Ultra: Best suited for users who value cutting-edge technology, a compact form factor, top-tier performance, and are willing to pay a premium for a foldable device.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is a foldable design a must-have? If yes, the Razr is the only option. If not, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ offers excellent value.
  2. What's your budget? The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ offers compelling features at a lower price point.
  3. What are your priorities? Prioritize battery life and a high-resolution camera? Choose Redmi. Prioritize performance and a unique form factor? Choose Razr.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I'd opt for the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ offers great value, I find the innovative foldable form factor and the significant performance jump of the Razr 50 Ultra too compelling. The superior chipset, smoother display, and compact design align better with my preference for cutting-edge technology and portability. I'm willing to accept the trade-offs of a smaller battery and a higher price for the unique experience the Razr 50 Ultra provides. While the potential durability concerns of foldable phones are valid, the advancements in this technology make it a risk I'm personally willing to take.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.