Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 11, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 201.8 g 189 g
Height 164.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar White
  • Graphite Gray
  • Star Blue
  • Ice blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4GZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Virtually identical in size, but the Redmi is slightly thinner.
Weight (g)201.8189The ZTE is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without more information.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzThe Redmi's AMOLED offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors. The 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to the ZTE's 90Hz.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612The Redmi has a much sharper display with higher pixel density (395 ppi vs 267 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Display Size6.67"6.6"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 732G (8 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)The Snapdragon 732G is a more powerful chipset, offering better overall performance and gaming capabilities compared to the Unisoc T606.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)The Redmi's CPU has faster clock speeds, translating to quicker app launches and smoother multitasking.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G57 MP1The Adreno 618 provides superior graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM8GB4GB/8GBThe reviewed Redmi configuration offers 8GB RAM ensuring smooth multitasking. The ZTE offers a 4GB RAM in the reviewed version which might lead to performance limitations with heavy multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera108MP50MPThe Redmi boasts a higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. However, image quality depends on various factors beyond resolution.
Other Cameras8MP ultrawide, 2MP depth, 5MP macro0.3MP (unknown purpose), 8MP selfieThe Redmi offers a more versatile camera system with an ultrawide lens and dedicated macro lens. The purpose of the 0.3MP lens on the ZTE is unclear.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsThe Redmi can record videos at a higher resolution (4K).
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity suggesting comparable battery life, although real-world usage will vary.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate offers a significantly better visual experience.
  • Stronger Performance: Snapdragon 732G and Adreno 618 provide smoother performance for gaming and demanding tasks.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Includes ultrawide and macro lenses for a wider range of photography options.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 108MP sensor potentially captures more detail.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option. (Specific prices not compared due to fluctuating market values)

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera versatility. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and mobile photography enthusiasts.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Users who prioritize a lighter phone.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Gamers and media consumers would benefit from the Redmi's superior display and performance.
  3. How important is camera quality? The Redmi provides a more versatile and potentially higher quality camera experience.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a lower price point, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior AMOLED display, more powerful processor, versatile camera system, and higher resolution for both photos and videos outweigh the ZTE's advantages in weight and price. The slightly higher price tag is justified by the significant jump in quality and performance. For my usage, which includes media consumption, gaming, and photography, the Redmi is the clear winner. The lighter weight of the ZTE is not a compelling enough factor to sacrifice the significant improvements offered by the Redmi.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.