Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 11, 2023 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g N/A
Weight 201.8 g 0 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar White
  • Graphite Gray
  • Star Blue
  • Ice blue
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4GTecno Spark Go 2024Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6Redmi is slightly thinner, Spark Go slightly narrower. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)201.80 (Missing data)Cannot compare weight without Spark Go's data.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzRedmi offers significantly better contrast, colors, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED and higher refresh rate.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Redmi has a much sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. Spark Go's display will appear pixelated.
PPI395267Reinforces the sharpness difference; Redmi's display is noticeably crisper.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 732G (8nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Redmi's processor is more powerful and power-efficient due to smaller manufacturing process. Expect smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Redmi has faster clock speeds, translating to quicker app launches and overall responsiveness.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G57 MP1Redmi's GPU is significantly more capable for gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM8GB4GBRedmi allows for more apps to run in the background without reloading, improving multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera108MP13MPRedmi boasts a much higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. Real-world image quality depends on processing, which is unclear.
Selfie Camera16MP8MPRedmi's selfie camera has higher resolution.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsRedmi can record higher resolution video.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, but real-world usage will vary depending on other factors like the display and processor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate offers a dramatically better visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful processor and GPU enable smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
  • Higher Resolution Cameras: Potentially better image and video quality.

Tecno Spark Go 2024 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Based on limited pricing data, it seems more affordable.
  • More Recent Android Version: Ships with Android 13, potentially offering newer features and longer software support.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: Redmi offers superior performance but at a higher price.
  • Display Quality vs. Battery Life: Redmi's AMOLED display is visually stunning but might consume more power than Spark Go's LCD. However, both have the same battery capacity so real-world difference is hard to determine.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and camera capabilities. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

Tecno Spark Go 2024: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and affordability over top-tier specs. Suitable for light usage like calling, texting, and browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi is more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and media consumption favor the Redmi; basic communication favors the Spark Go.
  3. How important is display quality? The Redmi's AMOLED display is a major differentiator.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Use: Tecno Spark Go 2024
  • Balanced Budget, Moderate Use: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G (if within budget)
  • Performance and Display Focused: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G

Reasoning: While the Tecno Spark Go 2024 might be more budget-friendly, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G offers significantly better performance, a vastly superior display, and potentially better camera capabilities. The Snapdragon 732G, coupled with 8GB of RAM and a 120Hz AMOLED display, promises a smooth and enjoyable user experience for various tasks. For me, the difference in user experience outweighs the price difference, making the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G the better overall choice. The higher resolution cameras are also a plus. However, if budget is extremely tight and only basic phone functionalities are needed, the Spark Go 2024 might suffice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.