Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 11, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 201.8 g 213 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.1 mm
Width 76.1 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar White
  • Graphite Gray
  • Star Blue
  • Ice blue
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4GSamsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly shorter and wider, negligible difference in thickness.
Weight (g)201.8213A55 slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal in practical use.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors, though Super AMOLED generally has better contrast. A55 having HDR10+ offers a wider range of colors and brightness in supported content compared to Dolby Vision on the Redmi.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 732G (8nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)A55's newer and smaller node size chip likely offers significantly better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55's CPU configuration suggests a notable performance advantage in demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 618Xclipse 530A55 likely has a more powerful GPU, leading to smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM8GB8GB/12GBA55 offers a 12GB RAM option for even more demanding multitasking.
OSAndroid 11Android 14A55 comes with a much newer OS version, offering feature updates, security patches, and potentially better optimization. A55 also has guaranteed updates to Android 18.
Camera
Main Camera108MP50MPRedmi has higher resolution, but A55 uses a newer Sony sensor known for good low-light performance, image quality is more than just megapixel count.
Ultrawide8MP13MPA55 has a higher resolution ultrawide, potentially capturing more detail.
Selfie16MP32MPA55 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fps with EISA55 features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity suggests comparable battery life, though real-world usage will vary due to chipset efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G Advantages:

  • Higher resolution main camera: Potentially more detail in well-lit conditions.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful and efficient processor: Resulting in smoother performance, better multitasking, and potentially longer battery life.
  • Newer OS with longer support: More features, better security, and guaranteed updates for several years.
  • Better camera features: OIS for video stabilization and a potentially superior main sensor for overall image quality. A55 also has a higher resolution ultrawide camera.
  • 5G Connectivity: Access to faster mobile data speeds where available.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a high-resolution main camera and don't require the latest performance or software. Best for casual use, social media, and light gaming.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users who value performance, longevity, a well-rounded camera system, and the latest software features. Ideal for demanding tasks, mobile gaming, and those seeking a future-proof device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi is generally more affordable.
  2. How important is performance and future software updates? The A55 significantly outperforms the Redmi in this area.
  3. What are your primary camera needs? While the Redmi boasts a higher megapixel count, the A55 offers better features and potentially superior overall image quality.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, basic usage: Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G.
  • Performance and longevity are priorities: Samsung Galaxy A55.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G offers a higher resolution main camera, the Samsung Galaxy A55 provides a far superior overall package. The newer and more powerful processor, longer software support, 5G connectivity, and camera features like OIS make it a much more compelling device for the long term. The performance difference alone would greatly enhance daily use, and the longer software update commitment ensures the phone remains secure and relevant for years to come. The slightly higher price is justified by the significant advantages the A55 offers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.