Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 11, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 201.8 g 197 g
Height 164.2 mm 161 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar White
  • Graphite Gray
  • Star Blue
  • Ice blue
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4GSamsung Galaxy A25Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1161 x 76.5 x 8.3Redmi is slightly taller and narrower. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)201.8197Almost identical weight, minimal difference in hand feel.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Samsung's "Super" AMOLED might offer slightly better contrast.
Display Size (inches)6.676.5Redmi has a slightly larger screen, providing more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
Peak Brightness (nits)1100 (typical), 700 (HBM)1000 (HBM)Redmi may be slightly brighter in direct sunlight. Missing typical brightness for Redmi makes direct comparison difficult.
Dolby VisionYesNoRedmi supports Dolby Vision for enhanced HDR video playback, offering better dynamic range and colors in compatible content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 732G (8nm)Exynos 1280 (5nm)Exynos 1280, being a newer generation and built on a smaller process node, should offer better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A25 has a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster app loading, multitasking, and potentially better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G68Mali-G68 generally offers better graphical performance than Adreno 618, benefiting gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM8GB6/8GB (Version Dependent)We are comparing the 8GB variants, so RAM is equal. More RAM enables smoother multitasking.
OSAndroid 11Android 14A25 ships with a much newer Android version, offering newer features, security updates, and longer software support.
Camera
Main Camera108MP50MPRedmi boasts a higher resolution main sensor. However, megapixel count doesn't guarantee better image quality. A25 has OIS, likely resulting in better low-light performance and video stability.
Video Recording4K@30fps4K@30fps with EISBoth offer 4K recording. A25 features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother video footage.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacities. Real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns and software optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Offers a slightly more immersive viewing experience.
  • Dolby Vision: Superior HDR video playback quality.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially more detailed photos in good lighting conditions.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • More Powerful Processor: Faster performance in everyday tasks and gaming.
  • Newer OS: Access to latest Android features and longer software support.
  • Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Improved low-light photography and video stability.
  • 5G Connectivity: Future-proofed for faster mobile data speeds (Significant advantage).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: Users prioritizing media consumption (movies, videos) and seeking a large, vibrant display. Budget-conscious users who don't need the absolute latest performance or OS version.

Samsung Galaxy A25: Users who value performance, longevity (software updates), and a reliable camera experience, especially in low light or for video recording. Users who want 5G connectivity.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is 5G connectivity essential? If yes, the A25 is the only option.
  2. Do you prioritize performance or media consumption? A25 for performance, Redmi Note 12 Pro for media consumption.
  3. How important are software updates and future-proofing? A25 offers a significant advantage in this area.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A25

While the Redmi Note 12 Pro has a larger display and Dolby Vision, the Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a significantly more compelling overall package. The newer and more powerful processor, the significantly newer Android version with longer software support lifespan, the inclusion of OIS for the camera, and, crucially, 5G connectivity make it a more future-proof and versatile device. The performance benefits and 5G connectivity alone outweigh the Redmi's advantages for me. Even if the Redmi Note 12 Pro has a higher resolution main camera, the lack of OIS in the Redmi likely puts the A25 ahead in overall image and video quality in various scenarios.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.