Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G vs Xiaomi Poco F6 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 30, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.49 cm³ 95.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.63 "/g 3.73 "/g
Weight 183.5 g 179 g
Height 165.7 mm 160.5 mm
Width 76 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Onyx Gray
  • Black
  • Green
  • Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 2400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.26 mAh/cm³ 52.27 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GXiaomi Poco F6Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.7 x 76 x 7.9160.5 x 74.5 x 8Poco F6 is slightly shorter and narrower, potentially improving one-handed usability.
Weight (g)183.5179Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.67Same screen size.
Resolution1080 x 24001220 x 2712Poco F6 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby VisionBoth offer smooth scrolling with 120Hz. Poco F6 supports HDR10+ and Dolby Vision for superior video quality with wider color gamut and dynamic range.
Peak Brightness1200 nits2400 nitsPoco F6 offers much higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 685 (6nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Poco F6 boasts a significantly more powerful processor, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)The Poco F6's newer CPU architecture provides a substantial performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 735Poco F6 has a much more capable GPU, delivering significantly better graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM4/6/8GB8/12GBPoco F6 offers more RAM in its base configuration, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPWhile both have the same resolution, the Poco F6 uses a Sony IMX882 sensor with a wider f/1.6 aperture, potentially capturing better low-light photos. Information about Redmi Note 12's sensor performance in low light is missing.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fps with EISPoco F6 offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rate, and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS).
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSame battery capacity.
Charging33W Fast Charging90W Fast ChargingPoco F6 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Expected to be significantly cheaper.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip offers a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Better Display: Sharper resolution, HDR10+, Dolby Vision support, and much higher peak brightness.
  • Faster Charging: 90W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Superior Camera Features: Better low-light photography potential, higher resolution video recording with EIS.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Redmi Note 12 4G:

  • Budget-conscious users: For those prioritizing affordability over top-tier performance.
  • Light users: Suitable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography.

Poco F6:

  • Power users: Ideal for gamers, content creators, and those who demand high performance.
  • Multimedia enthusiasts: The superior display and video recording capabilities cater to those who consume a lot of media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi Note 12 is expected to be much more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and multimedia consumption benefit greatly from the Poco F6's superior performance and display.
  3. How important is fast charging? The Poco F6's 90W charging is a major advantage for those who need quick top-ups.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6

While the Redmi Note 12 4G offers a budget-friendly option, the Poco F6 is the clear winner for me. The substantial upgrade in performance, display quality, camera features, and charging speed justifies the higher price. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ensures a future-proof experience, and the brilliant display enhances media consumption significantly. While I am not a heavy gamer, I appreciate a smooth and responsive user interface, which the Poco F6 undoubtedly delivers. The faster charging is a major convenience in my busy lifestyle. While price is a factor, the long-term value and superior user experience offered by the Poco F6 make it the more compelling choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.