Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 30, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.49 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.63 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 183.5 g 209 g
Height 165.7 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76 mm 78 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Onyx Gray
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.26 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.7 x 76 x 7.9161.7 x 78 x 8.2A35 slightly shorter and wider, negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)183.5209Redmi Note 12 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPersonal preference; under-display feels more modern, side-mounted potentially faster.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling thanks to 120Hz. Super AMOLED might offer slightly better contrast.
Display Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
Peak Brightness (nits)1200Not specifiedRedmi Note 12's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility outdoors. Lack of A35 data prevents full comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 685 (6nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)A35's 5nm Exynos 1380 should provide significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz A73 & 4x1.9 GHz A53)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)A35's more modern CPU architecture (A78 vs A73) translates to faster processing and better multitasking.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G68 MP5A35's Mali-G68 MP5 offers superior graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM4/6/8GB6/8GBBoth offer ample RAM for most users; 8GB provides better future-proofing and multitasking.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A35 ships with a newer Android version and longer update commitment (up to Android 18), offering better software support and features.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8, OISBoth have similar resolution. A35 benefits from Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and videos, especially in low light.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with EISA35 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS).
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity should offer similar screen-on time. A35's more efficient processor might extend battery life further.
Fast Charging33W25WRedmi Note 12 offers faster wired charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Redmi Note 12 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.
  • Faster Charging: 33W vs 25W.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.

Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Exynos 1380 outperforms Snapdragon 685.
  • Superior Camera: OIS for sharper images and 4K video recording.
  • Longer Software Support: Newer Android version with longer update commitment.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster data speeds and future-proof connectivity.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Redmi Note 12: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic tasks like calling, messaging, social media, and casual web browsing.

Galaxy A35: Users seeking better performance for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and multitasking. Also suitable for those who prioritize camera quality and software updates.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget?
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns?
  3. How important are camera quality and software updates?

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Redmi Note 12 offers a lower price and faster charging, the Galaxy A35's superior performance, camera with OIS, longer software support, and 5G connectivity make it a more compelling overall package for my needs. The performance difference between the Exynos 1380 and Snapdragon 685 is significant and would impact daily usability. I prioritize a smooth user experience, future-proofing with 5G, and capturing high-quality photos and videos, making the A35 the better choice despite the higher price. The longer software support also ensures a more secure and feature-rich experience over time.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.