Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G vs Nokia G42 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G42
Nokia G42
Nokia

General

Launch Date March 30, 2023 June 28, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.49 cm³ 107.56 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.63 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 183.5 g 193.8 g
Height 165.7 mm 165 mm
Width 76 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Onyx Gray
  • Red
  • Purple
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 82.7 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness 700 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.26 mAh/cm³ 46.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GNokia G42Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.7 x 76 x 7.9165 x 75.8 x 8.6Redmi Note 12 is slightly thinner and lighter.
Weight (g)183.5193.8Noticeable difference in hand, Redmi feels lighter.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzRedmi offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED and higher refresh rate. Nokia's LCD is less power-hungry but visually inferior.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the Redmi. Nokia's display will appear pixelated in comparison.
PPI395269Text and images will be crisper on Redmi.
Peak Brightness (nits)1200560 (peak), 450 (typ)Redmi's display will be much more visible in direct sunlight. Nokia provides limited brightness information.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 685 (6nm)Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm)Both offer decent performance for everyday tasks, but Snapdragon 685 is generally more powerful. However, the 480+ has 5G connectivity.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Redmi likely has a performance edge in demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 619Adreno 619 may offer slightly better gaming performance, but overall GPU performance difference should be minimal.
RAM4/6/8GB4/6GBMore RAM options available on the Redmi, allowing for better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPMegapixel count is similar but sensor details for Nokia are missing, hindering detailed comparison.
Other Cameras8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, 13MP selfie2MP depth, 2MP macro, 8MP selfieRedmi offers a more versatile camera setup with an ultrawide lens. Nokia's selfie camera has lower resolution.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity on both phones.
Fast Charging33W20WRedmi charges significantly faster.
Other FeaturesReverse chargingNo charger in boxRedmi can charge other devices wirelessly. Nokia excludes a charger.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate offers a significantly better visual experience.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • More Versatile Camera: Includes an ultrawide lens.
  • More Powerful CPU: Better performance in demanding tasks.
  • Reverse Charging: Can act as a power bank for other devices.

Nokia G42 Advantages:

  • 5G Connectivity: Future-proofs the device for faster network speeds.
  • Potentially Slightly Better GPU: Might offer a slight edge in gaming.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi Note 12 lacks 5G, prioritizing display and performance.
  • Nokia G42 compromises on display quality, charging speed, and camera versatility for 5G and a lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: Users who prioritize display quality, smooth performance, fast charging, and camera versatility. Suitable for media consumption, gaming, and photography enthusiasts.

Nokia G42: Users who prioritize 5G connectivity and affordability over other features. Best for budget-conscious buyers who need a future-proof device for basic tasks and communication.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is 5G connectivity essential for your current needs and location?
  2. How important is display quality and overall performance for your daily usage?
  3. What is your budget and what are you willing to compromise on?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, 5G Needed: Nokia G42
  • Prioritize Multimedia Experience: Redmi Note 12
  • Balanced Needs and Budget: Consider Redmi Note 12 if 5G is not immediately crucial.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G

Reasoning: While 5G is becoming increasingly important, the Redmi Note 12's significantly superior display, faster charging, better performance, and more versatile camera system outweigh the benefits of 5G for my personal use. I prioritize daily user experience and find the AMOLED display with 120Hz to be a major differentiator. The faster charging also significantly improves my workflow. While the Nokia G42 offers a competitive price, the compromises in key areas are too significant for me. I am willing to pay a bit more for the enhanced experience offered by the Redmi Note 12.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.