Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 23, 2022 May 1, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 109.13 cm³ 95.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.69 "/g
Weight 195 g 181 g
Height 163.6 mm 161.1 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Twilight Blue
  • Star Blue
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.82 mAh/cm³ 52.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 725

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco F5: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's explore the Redmi Note 11S 5G and Poco F5 through a user-centered lens.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRedmi Note 11S 5GPoco F5User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 13 (Android 11)MIUI 14 (Android 13)Poco F5 offers a potentially more refined and updated interface with newer features and optimizations.
Display6.6" IPS LCD 90Hz6.67" AMOLED 120HzPoco F5's AMOLED delivers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling, significantly impacting visual enjoyment.
Interaction FlowStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth offer familiar Android navigation, but Poco F5's faster processor and higher refresh rate enhance responsiveness.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth likely offer standard Android accessibility features, but specific implementations may vary.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, HeavierSlimmer, LighterPoco F5's reduced weight and slimmer profile enhance one-handed usability and comfort.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: A Day in the Life: Imagine you're a busy professional. The Redmi Note 11S 5G gets you through the day, but the Poco F5 elevates the experience. Scrolling through emails and presentations is noticeably smoother on the F5's 120Hz AMOLED display. Its superior processor effortlessly handles multitasking, letting you seamlessly switch between apps. When you need a quick recharge, the F5's 67W fast charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Note 11S 5G's 33W.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience, but the Poco F5, with its performance boost and enhanced display, is better suited for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize a premium visual experience. The Redmi Note 11S 5G remains a solid option for budget-conscious users seeking reliable performance for everyday tasks.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond the Specs: Choosing between these phones goes beyond numbers. Consider your personal priorities:

  • Visual Experience: Prioritize the Poco F5 for its superior AMOLED display.
  • Performance: Choose the Poco F5 for its significantly faster processor and smoother refresh rate.
  • Budget: The Redmi Note 11S 5G offers good value for its price.
  • Charging Speed: If quick charging is essential, the Poco F5 is the clear winner.

My Choice: The Poco F5

While the Redmi Note 11S 5G offers solid functionality, the Poco F5's superior display, significantly faster performance, and quicker charging make it the more compelling choice for me. The AMOLED screen transforms media consumption and everyday interactions, while the powerful processor ensures a smooth and responsive experience. As someone who values both aesthetics and performance, the F5 aligns better with my needs. The investment in the improved technology feels worthwhile for the long-term user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.