Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 18, 2022 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 94.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.7 "/g
Weight 202 g 181 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Star Blue
  • Graphite Gray (Stealth Black)
  • Polar White (Phantom White)
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 87 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 52.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Redmi Note 11 Pro and Galaxy A73 5G, going beyond the spec sheet to uncover what truly matters for everyday use.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 11 ProSamsung Galaxy A73 5GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mmA73 slightly thinner and lighter, more comfortable for one-handed use and extended holding.
Weight202g181gNoticeable difference; A73 reduces hand fatigue.
Display
Size6.67"6.7"Virtually identical; immersive experience on both.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Sharp visuals, indistinguishable at this size.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations, enhances gaming and UI responsiveness.
Brightness1200 nitsUnspecifiedRedmi's superior brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. A73's is a crucial missing data point.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G96Snapdragon 778G 5GA73's 778G significantly outperforms in benchmarks, translating to faster loading and smoother multitasking.
Antutu Score405,259575,551Quantifies the performance gap; A73 handles demanding tasks with greater ease.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 642LA73's GPU offers a better gaming and graphics-intensive application experience.
Camera
Main Camera108MP, f/1.9108MP, f/1.8A73's slightly wider aperture might offer a minor low-light advantage.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.432MP, f/2.2A73's higher resolution selfie camera captures more detail.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA73's 4K video recording capability is a significant advantage for content creators.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable endurance. Real-world tests needed.
Charging67W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingRedmi charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Snapdragon 778G 5G in the A73 delivers a substantial performance advantage over the Redmi's Helio G96. This translates to a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Display: While both boast 120Hz AMOLED displays, the Redmi's significantly higher brightness rating makes it a clear winner for outdoor use. The lack of brightness specification for the A73 is concerning.
  • Camera: Both feature 108MP main sensors, but the A73 pulls ahead with 4K video recording and a higher-resolution selfie camera. The Redmi counters with a slightly better DxOMark score (though limited data available for A73).
  • Battery: While battery capacities are identical, the Redmi's 67W fast charging dwarfs the A73's 25W, providing a significant time-saving advantage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Redmi Note 11 Pro: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize fast charging, bright displays for outdoor use, and solid overall performance. Ideal for social media, casual gaming, and everyday tasks.
  • Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: A better choice for those seeking superior performance, future-proof 5G connectivity, and higher quality video recording capabilities. Ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and content creators.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The Redmi generally offers better value for its price.
  2. Is top-tier performance a priority? If so, the A73's Snapdragon 778G is the clear winner.
  3. How important is fast charging? The Redmi's 67W charging is a major convenience.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

While the Redmi Note 11 Pro offers incredible value and impressive charging speeds, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. The significantly more powerful processor, ensuring a smoother user experience for years to come, is the deciding factor for me. The A73's superior performance, coupled with 5G connectivity and 4K video recording, makes it a more compelling long-term investment. The lack of brightness data for the A73 is a concern, but assuming a decent level of brightness, the performance gains outweigh the faster charging of the Redmi for my usage pattern. I prioritize a fluid, future-proof device, and the A73 fits that bill more effectively.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.