Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 18, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 202 g 209 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Star Blue
  • Graphite Gray (Stealth Black)
  • Polar White (Phantom White)
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Redmi Note 11 Pro and Galaxy A35, translating their spec sheets into real-world experiences. My aim is to equip you with the knowledge to choose the phone that truly fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 11 ProSamsung Galaxy A35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mmRedmi is slightly taller and thinner; A35 a tad wider. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight202g209gRedmi is slightly lighter, noticeable during extended use.
BuildGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusA35 boasts significantly better screen protection against drops and scratches.
Display
Size6.67"6.6"Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Negligible difference in sharpness. Both offer crisp visuals.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzButtery smooth scrolling and animations on both.
Brightness1200 nitsUnknownRedmi's superior brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility; a crucial advantage.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G96 (12nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)A35's 5nm chip offers significant performance and efficiency gains: faster, smoother, cooler.
Antutu405,259578,500A35's substantially higher score translates to noticeably quicker app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G68 MP5A35's more powerful GPU delivers smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM6GB/8GB6GB/8GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Camera
Main108MP, f/1.950MP, f/1.8Redmi boasts higher resolution; A35 potentially better low-light performance with wider aperture. DxOMark scores heavily favor the A35 indicating superior image and video quality overall.
Selfie16MP, f/2.413MP, f/2.2Similar selfie experience; slight edge to Redmi in daylight.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA35's 4K video recording capability is a major advantage for content creators.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhComparable battery capacity suggests similar endurance.
Charging67W25WRedmi's significantly faster charging is a major time saver.

2. Key Insights

The Redmi Note 11 Pro impresses with its vibrant display, incredibly fast charging, and high-resolution main camera. However, the Galaxy A35 pulls ahead with its superior processor, significantly better camera performance according to DxOMark, longer software support (Android 14 vs Android 11), more robust build (Gorilla Glass Victus), and 4K video recording.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Redmi Note 11 Pro: Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize fast charging, a bright display for outdoor use, and decent all-around performance. Ideal for social media, casual gaming, and everyday tasks.

Samsung Galaxy A35: The better overall phone. Suitable for users who demand smoother performance, better camera quality, future-proof software, and a more durable build. Excellent for mobile gaming, content creation, and those seeking a longer-lasting device.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The Redmi Note 11 Pro likely comes at a lower price point.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the A35's superior processor is crucial.
  3. How important is camera quality and future software updates? The A35's 4K video, higher DxOMark scores, and newer Android version make it the winner here.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Redmi Note 11 Pro offers impressive value, the Galaxy A35 is the superior device overall. The performance difference due to the Exynos 1380 is significant, ensuring a smoother and more responsive experience. The A35's superior camera performance (backed by DxOMark), 4K video recording, newer Android OS with longer software update support, and tougher Gorilla Glass Victus make it a more compelling long-term investment. While the Redmi's 67W charging is tempting, the A35's overall package provides a more well-rounded and future-proof experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.