Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F6 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 18, 2022 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 95.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.73 "/g
Weight 202 g 179 g
Height 164.2 mm 160.5 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar White
  • Graphite Gray
  • Atlantic Blue
  • Black
  • Green
  • Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 2400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 52.27 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco F6: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F6, going beyond the spec sheet to understand what these phones offer in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Poco F6Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm160.5 x 74.5 x 8 mmPoco F6 is noticeably more compact and lighter (179g vs 202g), improving one-handed usability.
BuildGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass VictusPoco F6 boasts significantly improved screen scratch and drop resistance.
Display
Size6.67"6.67"Identical screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001220 x 2712Poco F6's sharper resolution (446 ppi vs 395 ppi) delivers crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness1200 nits2400 nitsPoco F6's dramatically higher brightness ensures exceptional outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Poco F6's flagship processor delivers significantly faster performance across all tasks and gaming.
AnTuTu405,2591,530,662Poco F6 offers a massive performance leap, ideal for demanding users and gamers.
RAM(Unspecified)8GB/12GBPoco F6's ample RAM ensures smooth multitasking even with numerous apps open.
Storage(Unspecified)256GB/512GBPoco F6 provides significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Main Sensor108MP, f/1.950MP, f/1.6Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts higher resolution; Poco F6 likely prioritizes low-light performance with a larger sensor and wider aperture.
Video1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fpsPoco F6 offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity suggests comparable endurance.
Charging67W90WPoco F6 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Powerhouse: The Poco F6, with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor, obliterates the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in performance. This translates to blazing-fast app loading, seamless multitasking, and a superior gaming experience.
  • Display Delight: While both phones have the same size and refresh rate, the Poco F6's higher resolution and dramatically brighter display provide a noticeable advantage in clarity and outdoor visibility.
  • Camera Conundrum: The megapixel count might favor the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but the Poco F6's wider aperture on the main sensor hints at better low-light photography. Real-world image comparisons are needed to declare a winner. The lack of a macro lens on the Poco F6 might be a drawback for some.
  • Charging Champion: The Poco F6's 90W fast charging will top up your battery much quicker than the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 67W.
  • Software and Updates: The Poco F6 ships with Android 14 and has a longer update roadmap, guaranteeing software support for years to come.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display, decent battery life, and acceptable performance for everyday tasks.
  • Poco F6: Ideal for power users, gamers, and anyone who demands top-tier performance, a brilliant display, and fast charging.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Poco F6 is the clear winner.
  3. How important is software support and future updates? The Poco F6 provides a more future-proof option.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6

If I were choosing between these two, I'd go with the Xiaomi Poco F6. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a solid mid-range device, the Poco F6's significant advantages in performance, display, and charging are compelling. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a level of future-proofing that's crucial for a long-term smartphone investment. The brighter display and faster charging are significant quality-of-life improvements. While camera performance needs real-world testing, the overall package offered by the Poco F6 is simply too good to pass up for a performance-oriented user like myself. I value a smooth, lag-free experience, and the Poco F6 delivers that in spades.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.