Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 18, 2022 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 202 g 199 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.3 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar White
  • Graphite Gray
  • Atlantic Blue
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A34: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and Galaxy A34, going beyond the spec sheet to uncover what truly matters for everyday use.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A34Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mmA34 slightly wider, Redmi slightly taller, negligible difference
Weight202g199gVirtually identical, won't feel a difference in hand
BuildGorilla Glass 5UnknownRedmi offers superior screen protection
Display
Size6.67"6.6"Negligible size difference, both offer immersive experiences
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations
Brightness1200 nitsUnknownRedmi significantly brighter for outdoor visibility
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GDimensity 1080A34 boasts significantly better benchmark performance
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MC4A34 likely handles demanding games better
RAM6GB/8GBA34 offers better multitasking with more RAM options
Storage128GB/256GBA34 provides ample storage options
Camera
Main Camera108MP f/1.948MP f/1.8Redmi higher resolution, potentially more detail; trade-offs to be analyzed in Key Insights
Selfie Camera16MP f/2.413MP f/2.2Redmi higher resolution
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA34 offers superior video resolution
DXOMark Mobile7892A34 significantly better overall camera quality according to DXOMark
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity, expected similar endurance
Charging67W25WRedmi charges significantly faster

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Dimensity 1080 in the A34 demonstrably outperforms the Snapdragon 695 in benchmarks, translating to smoother multitasking and better gaming.
  • Display: While both offer 120Hz AMOLED screens, the Redmi's significantly higher brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility, a crucial advantage for many users. The missing brightness data for the A34 is a significant gap.
  • Camera: The Redmi boasts a 108MP main sensor, while the A34 opts for a 48MP sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). While megapixels don't tell the whole story, the real-world image quality differences will depend heavily on image processing. However, the DXOMark scores heavily favor the Galaxy A34, suggesting superior overall image and video quality despite the lower resolution main sensor. The A34's OIS will likely produce more stable videos, especially in low light.
  • Charging: The Redmi's 67W fast charging trumps the A34's 25W, meaning significantly less downtime plugged in.
  • Software: The A34 ships with Android 13, guaranteeing longer software support and newer features compared to the Redmi's Android 11. This is a major consideration for long-term use.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: Best for budget-conscious users prioritizing fast charging and bright outdoor visibility. It's a solid choice for media consumption and general use, though not the best for demanding gaming.
  • Samsung Galaxy A34: Ideal for users who value a smoother, more powerful performance, longer software updates, and superior camera quality as indicated by DXOMark. It's a better pick for mobile gaming and those seeking a more future-proof device.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The Redmi is typically more affordable.
  2. Is gaming a priority? The A34 offers a better gaming experience.
  3. How important are software updates and camera quality? The A34 wins in both categories.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G offers compelling features like faster charging and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is the more well-rounded device for my needs. The significantly better performance, newer software with longer update support, and superior camera quality according to DXOMark outweigh the Redmi's advantages. In the long run, the A34's performance and software updates would provide a more satisfying user experience. The unknown display brightness on the A34 is a concern, but the overall package leans heavily towards the A34.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.