Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G vs Oppo A77 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A77
Oppo A77
Oppo

General

Launch Date December 1, 2021 June 10, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 108.86 cm³ 98.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.45 "/g
Weight 181 g 190 g
Height 162 mm 163.8 mm
Width 75.5 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Gray
  • Pebble White
  • Sea Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Ocean Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 84 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 480 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.93 mAh/cm³ 50.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G and the Oppo A77. Both are solid contenders in the mid-range market, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. I'm going to break it all down, laying out the specs, real-world implications, and who these phones are best suited for.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed look at how these two phones stack up against each other:

FeatureXiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GOppo A77Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions162 × 75.5 × 8.9 mm163.8 × 75.1 × 8 mmSimilar size, the Oppo is a bit taller and thinner, the Xiaomi has slightly more volume and a larger footprint.
Weight181g190gXiaomi is slightly lighter, which may be noticeable during extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.56"Almost identical screen size.
Resolution1080x2400720x1612Xiaomi has a much sharper display; images and text will appear clearer.
PPI405269Xiaomi's higher pixel density results in a significantly crisper display.
TechnologyIPS LCDOppo has an IPS LCD display; the Xiaomi is undefined, which is a bit odd as it usually has AMOLED.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer a smooth scrolling experience.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsIdentical peak brightness, though actual brightness is crucial, something the data doesn't offer - the zero reading is likely missing data.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm)Oppo’s chip is more modern and power-efficient, though the Xiaomi has significantly better performance numbers.
Antutu Score253,10042,000Xiaomi scores significantly higher; expect noticeably faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MC2Different GPUs, generally the G57 on the Oppo is slightly more modern but doesn't appear to perform better.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh3200mAhXiaomi has a much larger battery, leading to potentially significantly longer battery life.
Charging18W Fast ChargingStandard ChargingXiaomi supports fast charging, refilling the battery more quickly.
FeaturesReverse, 9W reverse, non-removableNon-removableXiaomi can charge other devices; both have non-removable batteries.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.813MP, f/2.2Xiaomi has a higher resolution main sensor with a wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.016MP, f/2.0Oppo has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Wide Angle8MP, f/2.2N/AXiaomi includes a dedicated wide-angle lens.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4N/AXiaomi also has a dedicated macro lens.
Video1080p@30fps, slow-mo 120fps1080p@30fps, no slow-moBoth record at 1080p, but Xiaomi has slow-motion at 120fps.
Features4K, Triple cam, RAW, etc.Panorama, HDR, etc.Xiaomi has a more feature-rich camera system, particularly with 4k and RAW capability; Oppo has Panorama mode.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 12Oppo offers a slightly more modern software base, and it will get Android 14, while the Xiaomi is stuck on Android 11.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac, Direct802.11nXiaomi supports newer WiFi and Direct, offering faster wireless speeds and better networking capabilities.
Bluetooth5.1, LE, APT-x4.1Xiaomi offers a newer version with better power efficiency and higher-quality audio codec support.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASSXiaomi supports more satellite systems for more accurate location tracking.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIMBoth support dual SIM cards.
Storage & RAM
Internal128GB32GB/64GBXiaomi offers double the storage; Oppo comes in 32 and 64 GB variants, without expansion options.
RAM4GB/6GB3GB/4GBXiaomi offers more RAM for smoother multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither offers expandable storage.
Audio
QualityStereo SpeakersBasic AudioXiaomi provides better audio separation with stereo speakers.
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted FingerprintSide-mounted FingerprintBoth have a side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
ProtectionGorilla Glass 3Gorilla Glass 5Oppo uses a more modern Gorilla Glass for better scratch and shatter resistance.
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtualBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, CompassThe Xiaomi offers a slightly better sensor suite than the Oppo with a gyroscope and ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor

2. Key Insights

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G

  • Strengths: The Redmi Note 11 4G stands out with its significantly higher display resolution and pixel density, ensuring crisper visuals. It also boasts a much more powerful chipset in terms of performance, a larger battery capacity for extended usage, and a better main camera with more features. The inclusion of a wide-angle and macro lens adds versatility to photography. The inclusion of stereo speakers is something that you don't often see in budget phones, making for a better media consumption experience.
  • Competitive Advantages: The biggest edge is in performance and display, combined with battery life. These make it a strong choice for users who value responsiveness, multimedia consumption, and long-lasting power. The inclusion of features like 4K video and RAW photography capabilities also cater to more creative users.
  • Trade-offs: It comes with an older version of Android and will not get the last two updates.

Oppo A77

  • Strengths: The Oppo A77 shines with a more modern operating system (Android 12, upgradeable to 14), a higher-resolution selfie camera, and a newer version of Gorilla Glass, offering better protection. The chipset is also more power-efficient, however, the performance figures are very low.
  • Competitive Advantages: The focus here is more on modern software, a superior selfie cam, and screen protection, which makes it a good choice for those who prioritize these features.
  • Trade-offs: The biggest limitation is the lower screen resolution, relatively weak performance, smaller battery capacity, and basic audio features which are important for everyday use.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G:

    • Best For: Users who prioritize performance, gaming, media consumption, and battery life. Ideal for those who need a phone that can handle moderate multitasking and more demanding apps. Its camera is also better for general and low-light photography, with added flexibility provided by additional lenses.
    • Specific Use Cases: Mobile gamers, frequent travelers, avid social media users, and those who use their phone for work/productivity.
    • Price-to-Value Ratio: Generally a better value due to the significantly better performance.
  • Oppo A77:

    • Best For: Users who prefer the latest version of Android, take many selfies, and value screen protection. It's a better choice for basic everyday tasks, such as web browsing, calling, and using apps that don't require heavy processing power.
    • Specific Use Cases: Casual users, those who primarily use their phone for communication and browsing, and selfie enthusiasts.
    • Price-to-Value Ratio: It's less competitive in terms of specs, making its value more reliant on software and selfie camera performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help you decide:

  1. Do you prioritize a crisp display and overall performance? If yes, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G is the clear winner due to its significantly higher display resolution and more powerful processor.
  2. Do you need a phone for heavy multitasking or gaming? If so, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G's superior benchmark scores make it the better choice, the Oppo's very weak performance is something to steer clear of.
  3. Do you want the latest Android OS and take a lot of selfies? If yes, the Oppo A77 might be a better fit, it also has a slightly newer display protection. However, you'll be trading performance and battery life for these features.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: The Tech Enthusiast/Gamer: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G is the way to go. It provides the best performance, a sharper display, and the additional lenses for camera flexibility.
  • Scenario 2: The Casual User: The Oppo A77 could be a viable choice, if you need the latest android software, but you have to accept a big performance hit.
  • Scenario 3: The Photographer: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers the superior main sensor, as well as the added versatility of wide angle and macro lenses. It's also capable of shooting in RAW, giving greater control over image editing.

What I would Choose and Why

For me, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G is the clear choice. My focus is on responsiveness, battery life, and the capabilities of the phone for various tasks, and it has that in spades. The drastically higher performance score, combined with the better resolution screen, the versatility of the camera lenses and the larger battery for long days, make it an easy pick. While the lack of the most up-to-date Android version is a downside, for my use case, it's a worthy trade-off for overall performance and battery life.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.