1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.5 x 8.1 mm | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm | Slightly taller and narrower vs slightly shorter and wider; negligible difference in hand |
| Weight | 193g | 209g | Xiaomi is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for long use |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.67" | 6.6" | Negligible size difference; almost identical viewing experience |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Practically identical sharpness; negligible difference |
| PPI | 395 | 390 | Virtually identical pixel density; same display clarity |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Identical display technology; similar vibrant colors and deep blacks |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Smooth scrolling and animations on both phones |
| Brightness | 1200 nits | 0 nits | Redmi is significantly brighter, better for outdoor visibility in direct sunlight |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | Exynos is newer, more efficient, providing better performance |
| AnTuTu Score | 397,200 | 578,500 | Galaxy A35 offers snappier performance in daily use and gaming |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G68 MP5 | Galaxy A35 has a more powerful GPU leading to improved graphics performance |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Resolution | 108MP | 50MP | Xiaomi captures more detail in ideal conditions, Galaxy A35 better low light |
| Main Camera Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 | Galaxy A35 captures slightly more light, better low-light performance |
| Main Camera Sensor Size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.96" | Xiaomi's larger sensor captures more light and detail |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 16MP | 13MP | Xiaomi has slightly higher resolution, marginal difference |
| Selfie Camera Aperture | f/2.45 | f/2.2 | Galaxy A35 allows for slightly more light in selfies |
| Wide Angle Resolution | 8MP | 8MP | Comparable wide-angle shots |
| Portrait (Depth) | 2MP | None | Xiaomi has a dedicated depth sensor, better bokeh effects |
| Macro Lens | 5MP | 5MP | Comparable macro shots |
| Video Stabilization | No | EIS | Galaxy A35 offers electronic image stabilization for smoother videos |
| Slow Motion | 960fps | 240fps | Xiaomi offers significantly higher slow-motion capability |
| DxOMark Score | None | 104 (Mobile) | Galaxy A35 has an evaluated camera, offering better real-world image quality |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5020mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery life, negligible difference |
| Charging | 33W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging | Xiaomi charges faster, minimizing downtime |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 13) | Android 14 (upgradable to 18) | Galaxy A35 has newer OS, longer update support, more features |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | Galaxy A35 has faster Wi-Fi, better performance in crowded networks |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 | Galaxy A35 has more advanced and efficient Bluetooth connectivity |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Galaxy A35 has better GPS accuracy due to more systems |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 64/128/256 GB | 128/256 GB | Comparable storage options, but Redmi has a 64GB variant |
| RAM | 6/8 GB | 6/8 GB | Identical RAM options for multi-tasking |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither device offers expandable storage |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Similar audio quality experience |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted | Basic | Redmi's side-mounted fingerprint sensor may be more convenient for some users. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass Victus | Galaxy A35 has significantly better screen protection |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic Proximity | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic Proximity, Hall, Geomagnetic | Galaxy A35 features additional sensors |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Advantages:
- Brighter Display: The 1200 nits brightness makes it significantly better for outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.
- Faster Charging: 33W charging is faster than the A35's 25W, reducing charging time.
- Higher Resolution Main Camera: The 108MP main camera captures more detail.
- Higher Slow Motion FPS: The 960fps slow-motion video capture is significantly better.
- Lighter: 16 grams lighter, making it more comfortable for extended periods.
- Dedicated Depth Camera: The 2MP depth sensor provides better bokeh effects.
- Compass: Included for additional sensor support
Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset offers better CPU and GPU performance, leading to faster app loading and smoother gaming.
- Newer Android OS: Ships with Android 14 (upgradable to 18), offering longer software support and more features.
- Better Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus provides superior protection against scratches and cracks.
- Better Main Camera in Low-light: Larger aperture captures more light, resulting in better performance in low light.
- Video Stabilization: EIS enables smoother video recording.
- Better Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3 offer faster and more efficient connectivity.
- Better GPS Accuracy: QZSS satellite support.
- Additional sensors: Hall, Geomagnetic.
- DxOMark Camera Score: The score of 104 confirms a more refined camera system in real-world situations.
Trade-offs:
- The Redmi Note 10 Pro prioritizes screen brightness, charging speed, and camera resolution at the expense of raw processing power and software longevity.
- The Samsung Galaxy A35 focuses on overall performance, future-proofing, and durability, sacrificing some aspects like screen brightness and charging speed.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize a bright display for outdoor use.
- Users who want faster charging.
- Users who like higher resolution photos for social media and sharing.
- Users who prefer the convenience of a side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
- Casual gamers and media consumers.
- Users who do not prioritize the latest features or software updates.
- Budget conscious shoppers who don't mind an older device.
Use Cases:
- Outdoor photography and videography.
- Quick charging when time is limited.
- Daily social media content creation.
- Casual gaming.
Samsung Galaxy A35 Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize long-term software updates and security.
- Users who want the latest performance for smooth gaming and app usage.
- Users who need a durable phone with strong screen protection.
- Users who prioritize better low light camera performance.
- Users who want a consistent and reliable overall experience.
- Users who frequently use Bluetooth accessories and Wi-Fi connections
- Users who want superior video stabilization.
Use Cases:
- Mobile gaming and demanding applications.
- Long-term use without worrying about software becoming outdated.
- Users who prioritize camera performance in diverse lighting conditions.
- Heavy internet and multimedia consumption.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is outdoor visibility and screen brightness? If this is crucial, the Redmi Note 10 Pro's brighter screen is a significant advantage.
- How important is future-proofing and long-term software support? The Galaxy A35 with its newer OS and updates takes precedence.
- Is raw performance and smoother overall experience more crucial than camera resolution and charging speed? For performance and video stabilization, the Galaxy A35 is better.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
Scenario 1: Bright Sunlight Usage - If you frequently use your phone outdoors in bright sunlight, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's brighter display makes it the better option.
Scenario 2: Gaming & Performance - For smooth, lag-free gaming and demanding tasks, the Samsung Galaxy A35's superior chipset will provide a much better experience.
Scenario 3: Long-term Software Support - If you plan to use the phone for several years and prioritize software updates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 provides a better long term experience.
Scenario 4: Social Media and Casual Photography - The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro offers a higher resolution main camera. For casual social media the Redmi Note 10 Pro might be more appealing.
Scenario 5: Value-conscious - Depending on current pricing, the Redmi Note 10 Pro may offer a more budget-friendly option with a reasonable balance of features.
What I would choose and why
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35.
While the Redmi Note 10 Pro has its advantages, the A35 presents a more compelling package for my needs and preferences. The brighter display and faster charging on the Redmi are tempting, but I value a smoother, more future-proof experience. I would be willing to trade the higher resolution camera and the slightly faster charging for the superior performance of the Exynos 1380, the longer software support, and the added protection of Gorilla Glass Victus. The better low light camera performance, enhanced connectivity and video stabilization further support my decision. Ultimately, the Galaxy A35 feels like a more well-rounded device for the long term.
