Xiaomi Redmi A3 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 23, 2024 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.58 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 193 g 222 g
Height 168.3 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.3 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 21:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 500 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.05 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.91 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the Samsung Galaxy M35. Instead of getting lost in a sea of specs, we'll explore how these devices translate into real-world experiences for you.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A3Samsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
Display6.71" IPS LCD, 90Hz6.6" Super AMOLED, 120HzThe M35's Super AMOLED offers richer colors and deeper blacks, enhancing visual immersion. The higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling.
Resolution720x1650 (HD+)1080x2340 (FHD+)Sharper details and clearer visuals on the M35 due to the higher resolution.
Dimensions/Weight168.3 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm, 193g162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm, 222gThe Redmi A3 is lighter and slightly thinner, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both offer the latest Android experience, ensuring access to current features and security updates.
Battery5000 mAh6000 mAhThe M35 offers significantly longer battery life, reducing the need for frequent charging.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student using your phone for note-taking, browsing social media, and streaming videos.

  • Redmi A3: The large screen provides ample space for note-taking, but the lower resolution might make detailed images or videos less crisp. The 90Hz refresh rate offers smooth scrolling, but the battery might not last a full day of heavy use.

  • Galaxy M35: The vibrant AMOLED display brings your lecture notes and social media feeds to life. The 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling incredibly smooth, creating a more fluid experience. The larger battery ensures you can power through your day without worrying about running out of juice.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For budget-conscious users: The Redmi A3 offers essential features at an affordable price point. It's a practical choice for those prioritizing functionality over premium features.

  • For multimedia enthusiasts: The Galaxy M35's superior display and longer battery life make it ideal for consuming media, gaming, and multitasking.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Redmi A3 prioritizes affordability and practicality. The Galaxy M35 focuses on delivering a more immersive and premium multimedia experience. Both are well-designed devices, but they cater to different priorities.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35.

Why? While the Redmi A3 is a compelling option for its price, I value the superior visual experience offered by the M35's AMOLED display and higher resolution. The smoother 120Hz refresh rate, significantly longer battery life, and more powerful processor make a noticeable difference in daily use. For me, these enhancements justify the higher price point, as they contribute to a more engaging and enjoyable user experience. The improved video capabilities are also a major plus. Ultimately, the M35 offers a richer, more immersive mobile experience that aligns with my preference for seamless performance and vibrant visuals.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.