Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g N/A
Weight 192 g 0 g
Height 164.9 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.8 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Tecno Spark Go 2024Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6Negligible size difference; both are large phones.
Weight (g)1920 (Missing data - cannot compare)Weight significantly impacts comfort; Tecno's weight is crucial but unknown.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.6Tecno offers slightly larger screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1612Virtually identical resolutions; expect similar sharpness.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD, offering good color reproduction and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Higher refresh rate on Tecno results in smoother scrolling and animations, improving user experience.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Both are entry-level chipsets; performance differences likely minor. Benchmarking data would be needed for accurate comparison.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Tecno's CPU architecture is more modern with faster cores potentially offering better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1Both are entry-level GPUs; gaming performance likely similar. Specific benchmarks are needed for a definitive comparison.
RAM2/3GB3/4GBTecno offers more RAM in its configurations, leading to better multitasking and app switching.
OSAndroid 12Android 13Tecno comes with a newer Android version, offering potential performance improvements, new features, and longer security updates.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP + 0.3MP13MP + 0.1MPTecno boasts a higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detail. The secondary lens on both phones seems to have minimal practical use (0.3MP/0.1MP).
Front Camera5MP8MPTecno offers a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsIdentical video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities; expected similar battery life. Real-world usage and optimization play a significant role.
Charging10W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingBoth offer the same charging speed.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Belongs to the "low price" range, suggesting affordability.

Tecno Spark Go 2024 Advantages:

  • Newer OS: Android 13 offers better performance, features, and security compared to Android 12.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: 90Hz display provides smoother visuals.
  • More RAM: Configurations with more RAM enable better multitasking.
  • Higher Resolution Cameras: Potentially better photo and video quality.
  • USB Type-C: More modern and versatile connector compared to microUSB.
  • Fingerprint Sensor: Added security and convenience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality (calling, texting, browsing) and long battery life. Ideal for:

  • Basic phone users: Individuals who primarily use their phone for essential communication.
  • Students: Affordable option for light academic use.
  • Elderly users: Simple and easy-to-use interface.

Tecno Spark Go 2024: Users who want a modern smartphone experience with a smoother display, better performance, and enhanced camera capabilities without breaking the bank. Ideal for:

  • Casual gamers: The improved CPU and higher refresh rate might offer a slightly better gaming experience.
  • Social media users: Better cameras for capturing and sharing photos and videos.
  • Users who consume media: Larger screen and smoother scrolling enhance video watching and browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is likely significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. media consumption, gaming, etc.
  3. How important are features like a smoother display, better camera, and newer OS?

My Choice: Tecno Spark Go 2024

While the missing weight for the Tecno makes a definitive judgment difficult, based on available information, I would choose the Tecno Spark Go 2024. The newer Android version, higher refresh rate display, increased RAM, better cameras, USB Type-C port, and fingerprint sensor offer a significantly more modern and enjoyable smartphone experience. Even if the price is slightly higher, these advantages outweigh the cost difference for most users beyond those seeking the absolute cheapest option. The improved CPU architecture in the Tecno also suggests better long-term performance compared to the Redmi A2. A lighter Tecno would solidify this choice, but even with a heavier build, the advantages are compelling.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.