Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 192 g 222 g
Height 164.9 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.8 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1Virtually identical in size and thickness.
Weight (g)192222Redmi A2 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDSamsung offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles.
Display Size (inches)6.526.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340Samsung boasts much sharper visuals due to higher resolution.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzSamsung's 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing responsiveness.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Galaxy M35 will offer significantly better performance and efficiency due to a more advanced and smaller node size chipset.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Galaxy M35 uses newer, faster core architecture for superior processing power.
RAM2/3/4GB6/8GBMore RAM in the M35 enables better multitasking and smoother performance.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G68 MP5M35 offers a considerably more powerful GPU for better gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP Main, 0.3MP Auxiliary50MP Main, 8MP Wide, 2MP MacroGalaxy M35 offers significantly higher resolution, versatility with wide and macro lenses, and potentially better image quality.
Front Camera5MP13MPHigher resolution selfie camera on the M35.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@480fpsM35 supports higher resolution and frame rate video recording, including slow-motion.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh6000 mAhLarger battery in the M35 should provide longer battery life.
Charging10W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingSignificantly faster charging on the M35.
Other
NFCNoYesM35 supports contactless payments and data transfer.
OSAndroid 12Android 14M35 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
USBmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C 2.0Type-C on the M35 is more modern and reversible.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably easier for one-handed use.
  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution and refresh rate provides a dramatically better visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: Faster processor, more RAM, and a more powerful GPU result in a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, including wide and macro lenses, along with 4K video recording.
  • Larger Battery and Faster Charging: Longer usage time and quicker charging.
  • Modern Features: NFC for contactless payments, newer Android OS, and USB Type-C.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi A2: Sacrifices performance, display quality, and features for affordability.
  • Galaxy M35: Higher price for premium features and performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Redmi A2: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light usage. Suitable for:

  • Calling and texting
  • Basic web browsing
  • Social media consumption

Galaxy M35: Suitable for users who demand a smoother, more powerful experience with a better display and camera. Ideal for:

  • Gaming
  • Media consumption (videos, photos)
  • Multitasking
  • Mobile photography

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic use, the A2 suffices; for demanding tasks, the M35 is necessary.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display quality, performance, camera, and battery life if choosing the M35.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Redmi A2 offers excellent value for its low price, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved display, performance, camera, and battery life are worth the price difference. The modern features like NFC, a newer Android version, and USB-C further solidify its advantage. Even though specific pricing wasn't provided to make a direct value comparison, the leap in usability and future-proofing makes the M35 a much better long-term investment. The Redmi A2's advantages in weight and price are outweighed by the M35's comprehensive superiority in critical areas that impact daily usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.