Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 192 g 209 g
Height 164.9 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.8 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Samsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1161.7 x 78 x 8.2Galaxy A35 is slightly shorter, narrower, and significantly thinner. This translates to a more pocketable and premium feel.
Weight (g)192209Redmi A2 is noticeably lighter, potentially reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedUnable to compare build quality and durability without specific materials (e.g., plastic, glass, metal).
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDGalaxy A35's AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency. Redmi A2's LCD might be brighter outdoors.
Display Size (inches)6.526.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340Galaxy A35 offers significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution. Text, images, and videos will appear clearer and more detailed.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzGalaxy A35's 120Hz refresh rate provides a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially noticeable in scrolling and gaming.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G36 (12nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)Galaxy A35's 5nm Exynos chip offers significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to Redmi A2's 12nm Helio G36. Expect smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreWhile both are octa-core, the A35's architecture (Cortex-A78 & A55) is more modern and powerful than the Redmi A2's (Cortex-A53).
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G68 MP5Galaxy A35 boasts a more powerful GPU, enabling smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM2GB/3GB6GB/8GBGalaxy A35 offers substantially more RAM, leading to significantly improved multitasking performance and app loading speeds.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP + 0.3MP50MP + 8MP + 5MPGalaxy A35 offers a vastly superior camera system with higher resolution, a dedicated wide-angle lens, and a macro lens. Expect significantly better photos and videos.
Front Camera5MP13MPGalaxy A35's front camera boasts higher resolution for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsGalaxy A35 can record video at a much higher resolution.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and usage patterns. A35's more efficient chip may provide longer battery life.
Fast Charging10W25WGalaxy A35 supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Much faster processor, GPU, and more RAM for smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Better Display: AMOLED display with higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate delivers a significantly better visual experience.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, wider lens selection, and 4K video recording capabilities provide a vastly improved photography experience.
  • Faster Charging: Supports 25W fast charging for quicker top-ups.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.
  • More Up-to-date Software: Ships with a newer Android version and longer software support commitment.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality for calling, texting, and light internet browsing. Ideal for:

  • First-time smartphone users: Simple interface and affordability make it a good entry-level device.
  • Users on a tight budget: Provides essential smartphone features without breaking the bank.
  • Secondary phone users: Suitable for a basic backup device.

Samsung Galaxy A35: Users who value performance, a great display, a good camera, and up-to-date software. Ideal for:

  • Gamers: Powerful hardware ensures a smooth gaming experience.
  • Content consumers: High-resolution display and good speakers enhance media consumption.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Versatile camera system allows capturing high-quality photos and videos.
  • Users who demand smooth performance: 120Hz refresh rate and powerful chipset deliver a fluid experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic communication vs. gaming, photography, demanding applications.
  3. How important is long-term software support? The A35 will receive more updates.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Redmi A2
  • Balanced Needs & Budget: Consider other mid-range options besides these two.
  • Performance & Features Prioritized: Galaxy A35

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Redmi A2 provides excellent value for its incredibly low price, the Galaxy A35 offers a significantly better overall user experience. The superior performance, display, camera, and software support make it a worthwhile investment for most users. Even though it's more expensive, the long-term benefits of a smoother, more feature-rich device outweigh the initial cost difference for me. The 120Hz refresh rate alone drastically improves daily interactions. I also value having a capable camera and the peace of mind that comes with longer-term software updates and security patches. While budget is always a factor, the A35 strikes a better balance between price and performance in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.