Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 104.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 192 g 195 g
Height 164.9 mm 162.1 mm
Width 76.8 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 82.4 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 47.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Samsung Galaxy A24 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3A24 slightly shorter, narrower, and thinner. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)192195Virtually identical weight.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and materials unknown for both, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDA24 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles with AMOLED.
Display Size (inches)6.526.5Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340A24 has a much sharper display with higher pixel density (396 ppi vs 269 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh RateUnspecified90HzA24's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness400 nits (typ)1000 nits (peak)A24 will be significantly more readable in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)G99 offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to smaller process node and superior CPU architecture.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A24 boasts more powerful cores (Cortex-A76) for demanding tasks. Redmi A2 relies on older, less efficient Cortex-A53 cores.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MC2A24 has a more powerful GPU, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM2/3GB4/6/8GBA24 offers more RAM options, with higher capacities enabling better multitasking and app performance.
OSAndroid 12Android 13A24 comes with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP Main, 0.3MP Auxiliary50MP Main, 5MP Ultrawide, 2MP MacroA24 offers a significantly more versatile and higher resolution camera system with ultrawide and macro capabilities.
Front Camera5MP13MPA24 provides higher resolution for selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fps with EISBoth record at 1080p, but A24 features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity.
Charging10W25WA24 supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, 90Hz refresh rate, and higher brightness deliver a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful chipset, CPU, and GPU result in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming capabilities.
  • More Versatile Camera: Higher resolution main sensor, ultrawide and macro lenses offer greater flexibility for photography.
  • Faster Charging: 25W charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.
  • Newer OS: Android 13 with potentially longer software updates.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light web browsing. Ideal for:

  • Basic phone users: Calling, texting, and occasional internet use.
  • Secondary phone: For specific tasks or as a backup device.

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Users who value a well-rounded experience with a good display, performance, and camera. Ideal for:

  • Everyday users: Social media, web browsing, multimedia consumption, casual gaming, and photography.
  • Users seeking long-term value: Newer OS and hardware suggest longer usability.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. multimedia consumption, gaming, photography.
  3. How important are display quality, performance, and camera capabilities? A24 excels in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G

While the Redmi A2 offers an extremely low price point, the Galaxy A24 provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, performance, camera, and faster charging outweigh the price difference for most users. The A24 represents a much better long-term investment due to its more modern hardware and software, promising a longer lifespan and better usability. The inclusion of NFC further enhances its practicality for everyday use. The Redmi A2 is only justifiable for extremely budget-constrained users who prioritize basic functionality above all else.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.