Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Samsung Galaxy A05 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 October 15, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 116.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 192 g 195 g
Height 164.9 mm 168.8 mm
Width 76.8 mm 78.2 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 82.1 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 262 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 43.04 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Samsung Galaxy A05Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8A05 slightly larger, but thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)192195Virtually identical weight.
Build MaterialUnspecifiedUnspecifiedMaterial impacts durability and premium feel. Lack of information limits comparison.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.7A05 has a slightly larger screen, providing more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution. Sharpness will be similar, but slightly lower pixel density on the A05 due to the larger screen size.
Display TypeIPS LCDPLS LCDBoth are LCD panels. PLS LCD generally offers slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles compared to standard IPS.
Refresh Rate (Hz)UnspecifiedUnspecifiedImpacts smoothness of scrolling and animations. Lack of information limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)G85 is more powerful, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)A05's CPU architecture is more modern and efficient, providing a noticeable performance boost.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2A05's GPU is significantly more powerful, enabling better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM2/3GB4/6GBA05 offers more RAM options, improving multitasking and overall responsiveness. More RAM is crucial for demanding tasks and future-proofing.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP Main, 0.3MP Auxiliary50MP Main, 2MP DepthA05 boasts a significantly higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detailed photos. The depth sensor aids in portrait mode.
Front Camera5MP8MPA05 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsA05 offers 60fps recording, resulting in smoother videos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Fast Charging10W25WA05 supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Based on the provided price data, the Redmi A2 starts at a lower price point.

Samsung Galaxy A05 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Helio G85 chipset, coupled with more RAM, delivers a much smoother and responsive user experience.
  • Improved Camera: The 50MP main camera and higher resolution front camera will likely produce superior photos and videos.
  • Faster Charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the Redmi A2's 10W.
  • USB Type-C: While both have 2.0 speeds, USB-C is a more modern and versatile connector.
  • More Up-to-Date OS: Launching with Android 13 provides a newer user experience and potentially longer software support.

Trade-offs:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A05 likely comes at a higher price, though specific pricing varies by region and configuration.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light usage (calls, texts, browsing). Best for users who are extremely price-sensitive and don't demand high performance.

Samsung Galaxy A05: Users who want a more responsive and versatile phone for everyday tasks, including social media, light gaming, and photography. Better suited for users who value performance, camera quality, and faster charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is for the most budget-conscious, while the A05 requires a larger investment.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic usage, the Redmi A2 suffices. For more demanding tasks and entertainment, the A05 is superior.
  3. How important is camera quality and charging speed? The A05 offers significant advantages in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A05

While the Redmi A2 offers extreme affordability, the Samsung Galaxy A05 provides a significantly better overall user experience due to its superior performance, camera, charging speed, and more modern USB-C port. The relatively small price difference is easily justified by these tangible improvements in daily usage. Even for a budget-conscious buyer, the long-term frustration of a sluggish phone outweighs the initial price savings. The A05's better performance and features will provide a more enjoyable and longer-lasting experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.