Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 192 g 185 g
Height 164.9 mm 164.6 mm
Width 76.8 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Realme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6Realme C65 is slightly thinner and lighter. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)192185Realme C65 is slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.67Realme C65 offers a slightly larger display for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1604Virtually identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, expecting similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Realme C65's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to the Redmi A2's unspecified refresh rate (likely 60Hz).
Peak Brightness (nits)400 (typ)500 (typ), 625 (HBM)Realme C65 significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)Realme C65's Helio G85 generally offers better performance in gaming and multitasking compared to the Helio G36.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Realme C65's CPU architecture is more modern and powerful.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2Realme C65's GPU provides notably better graphics performance for gaming.
RAM (GB)2/38Realme C65 offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding apps.
Storage (GB)32/64128Realme C65 offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)8 MP + 0.3MP (depth)50 MP + 2MP (depth)Realme C65 boasts a much higher resolution main sensor, likely resulting in significantly better image quality.
Front Camera (MP)5 MP8 MPRealme C65 has a higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, Slow Motion 120fpsSimilar primary video recording capabilities, but Realme C65 offers slow-motion recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W45WRealme C65 offers significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Helio G85 chipset, coupled with more RAM, delivers smoother multitasking and better gaming capabilities.
  • Brighter and Smoother Display: The 90Hz refresh rate and higher peak brightness enhance the visual experience.
  • Faster Charging: 45W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Better Camera: The 50MP main camera and improved features offer significantly enhanced photography potential.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.
  • USB Type-C: More modern and versatile connector.

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light web browsing. Best for:

  • Basic phone calls and texting
  • Casual social media usage
  • Light web browsing

Realme C65: Suitable for users who want a well-rounded smartphone with good performance, a decent camera, and fast charging. Best for:

  • Mobile gaming
  • Media consumption (videos, photos)
  • Multitasking
  • Photography enthusiasts

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is a budget option, while the Realme C65 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic communication vs. gaming, photography, and multitasking.
  3. How important is performance and camera quality? The Realme C65 excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget: Redmi A2
  • Balanced Needs and Budget: Realme C65
  • Performance and Camera Focused: Realme C65

My Choice: Realme C65

While the Redmi A2 offers an extremely attractive price point, the Realme C65 offers significantly better value for the price difference. The performance gap, superior camera, faster charging, NFC functionality, and smoother display make the Realme C65 a much more compelling device for a broader range of users. The Redmi A2's only significant advantage is its lower price, but the compromises in performance and features are too substantial for me personally. I prioritize a smoother user experience, better camera quality, and faster charging, all of which the Realme C65 delivers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.