Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Realme C61 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C61
Realme C61
Realme

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 July 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 100.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 192 g 188 g
Height 164.9 mm 167.3 mm
Width 76.8 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Dark Green
  • Sparkle Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 560 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 49.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Realme C61Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1167.3 x 76.7 x 7.8Realme C61 is slightly larger but thinner. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)192188Realme C61 is marginally lighter.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.74Realme C61 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution, but due to the size difference, Redmi A2 has a slightly higher pixel density (269 vs 260 ppi). Difference is negligible in practice.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Realme C61's 90Hz refresh rate will provide a smoother, more responsive user experience, especially noticeable in scrolling and gaming.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles. Realme C61 boasts higher typical brightness (450 nits vs 400 nits).
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)Both are entry-level chipsets. Performance differences likely to be minimal for basic tasks. Benchmark comparisons would be needed for a definitive conclusion.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Realme C61 utilizes a more modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A75) potentially offering performance benefits in demanding tasks.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57Difficult to compare without benchmark data.
RAM2/3 GB6/8GB (depending on version)Realme C61 offers significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps.
OSAndroid 12Android 14Realme C61 comes with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. It's unclear if Redmi A2 will receive updates to Android 14.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP Main + 0.3MP (Unspecified)32MP Main + 2MP DepthRealme C61 boasts significantly higher resolution main camera, likely resulting in better image quality. The practical impact of the 2MP depth sensor on Realme C61 is questionable.
Front Camera5MP5MPIdentical front camera resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity. Expect similar battery life depending on usage.
Charging10W45WRealme C61 offers significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C61 Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate provides a noticeably better user experience.
  • More RAM: Significantly more RAM ensures better multitasking and overall performance.
  • Faster Charging: 45W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 32MP sensor potentially captures more detailed images.
  • Newer Android Version: Android 14 offers potential feature and security benefits.
  • USB Type-C: More modern and versatile connector compared to microUSB.

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While exact prices weren't compared, Redmi A2 is likely more affordable given its lower specs.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C61: Suitable for users who prioritize a smooth display, faster charging, better camera, and more recent software. Ideal for light gaming, social media, and content consumption.

Xiaomi Redmi A2: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality for calling, texting, and light web browsing. Ideal for users who primarily need a simple, affordable smartphone.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is likely cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For basic use, either phone suffices. For gaming or media consumption, the C61's advantages are significant.
  3. How important is software and future updates? The C61's newer Android version is a significant advantage in this regard.

My Choice: Realme C61

While more expensive, the Realme C61 offers significant advantages in terms of user experience. The 90Hz display, larger RAM capacity, significantly faster charging, higher resolution camera, and newer Android OS make it a much more compelling device for the majority of users. Even though benchmark comparisons weren't possible, the combination of the Unisoc Tiger T612 with the Mali-G57 GPU and significantly higher RAM capacity suggest better overall performance for the Realme C61. While the Redmi A2 is a viable option for extremely budget-conscious buyers who only need basic functionality, the Realme C61 provides a significantly better user experience for a relatively small price increase.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.