Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Motorola Moto G54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 September 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 95.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 192 g 177 g
Height 164.9 mm 161.6 mm
Width 76.8 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 52.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Motorola Moto G54Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1161.6 x 73.8 x 8.0Moto G54 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)192177Moto G54 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality comparison is impossible without material information.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.5Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Moto G54 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
PPI269405Moto G54's higher pixel density provides a much crisper visual experience.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, offering good color reproduction but potentially limited viewing angles compared to OLED.
Refresh RateUnspecified120HzMoto G54's 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother animations and scrolling.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6nm)Moto G54's 6nm chipset offers significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G54 has a more powerful CPU architecture, enabling faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUPowerVR GE8320IMG BXM-8-256Moto G54 boasts a superior GPU, leading to smoother gaming and graphics performance.
RAM2GB/3GB8GBMoto G54 offers significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP Main, 0.3MP unspecified50MP Main, 2MP MacroMoto G54's 50MP main camera should offer significantly better image quality and detail. The 2MP macro lens on the G54 allows for close-up shots, while the purpose of Redmi A2's 0.3MP lens is unclear.
Front Camera5MP16MPMoto G54's 16MP front camera will likely produce higher resolution selfies.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsMoto G54 can record videos at a higher frame rate (60fps), resulting in smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBoth phones have the same battery capacity.
Charging10W15WMoto G54 supports faster charging.
TypeLi-IonLi-PolymerLi-Polymer batteries generally degrade slower than Li-Ion.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Dimensity 7020 chipset, more RAM, and powerful GPU offer a much smoother and faster user experience.
  • Sharper display: Higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate make for a more enjoyable viewing experience.
  • Superior camera: The 50MP main camera and 16MP selfie camera provide much better image quality.
  • Faster Charging: 15W charging will top up the battery quicker than the Redmi A2's 10W.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.
  • More updated OS and Bluetooth: Android 13 and Bluetooth 5.3 offer potential feature and performance improvements.

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly cheaper, making it accessible to budget-conscious users.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi A2 sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for affordability.
  • Moto G54 comes at a higher price but offers a substantially improved overall user experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2: Users with extremely tight budgets who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, light web browsing) over performance or advanced features.

Motorola Moto G54: Users who want a smooth and responsive phone for everyday tasks, including social media, web browsing, casual gaming, and photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget?
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns?
  3. Which features are most important to you (performance, camera, display)?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight budget, basic usage: Redmi A2.
  • Balanced budget, everyday use with some gaming and photography: Moto G54.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G54

While the Redmi A2 offers an extremely low price point, the Moto G54's significant advantages in performance, display, camera, and features make it the clear winner for me. The difference in user experience would be substantial, and the higher price of the G54 is justified by the significant upgrades. I value a smooth and responsive phone with a good camera and display, and the Moto G54 delivers on those fronts. The inclusion of NFC for contactless payments is also a significant plus. Even though the specific build materials are unknown, the lighter weight of the Moto G54 contributes significantly to better handling. Unless budget is an absolute constraint, the Moto G54 offers a far superior overall package.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.