Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 192 g 174.9 g
Height 164.9 mm 161.9 mm
Width 76.8 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2Motorola Edge 50 FusionPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9Edge 50 Fusion is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)192174.9Edge 50 Fusion is noticeably lighter.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild material impacts durability and premium feel; information lacking for both.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDP-OLEDP-OLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.526.7Edge 50 Fusion has a slightly larger display.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Edge 50 Fusion has a significantly sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh RateUnspecified120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT)Edge 50 Fusion's high refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Edge 50 Fusion's chipset is significantly more powerful and efficient.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Edge 50 Fusion will offer much better performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
RAM2/3/4GB8/12GBEdge 50 Fusion offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding apps.
Storage32/64GB128/256/512GBEdge 50 Fusion provides much more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Main Camera8MP50MPEdge 50 Fusion's higher resolution main camera potentially captures more detailed photos.
Front Camera5MP32MPEdge 50 Fusion offers significantly better selfie camera resolution.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsEdge 50 Fusion supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBoth phones have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W68WEdge 50 Fusion charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Much more powerful processor and ample RAM for smooth multitasking and demanding applications.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution, refresh rate, and OLED technology offer a far superior visual experience.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster charging speeds minimize downtime.
  • More Storage: Provides ample storage space for apps, media, and files.
  • Better Camera System: Higher resolution sensors and features like OIS potentially result in better quality photos and videos.
  • More Modern Connectivity: Includes NFC, 5G connectivity, USB Type-C, and the latest Bluetooth version.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light tasks like web browsing and social media. Good for:

  • First-time smartphone users
  • Users with limited budgets
  • Individuals who primarily use their phones for calling and texting

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Ideal for users who demand a smooth and powerful smartphone experience for gaming, multitasking, media consumption, and photography. Good for:

  • Power users
  • Mobile gamers
  • Photography enthusiasts
  • Users who value a premium display experience

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is a budget option, while the Edge 50 Fusion is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding apps and gaming.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Display quality, performance, camera, battery life, charging speed.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

While the Redmi A2 provides incredible value for its low price, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is the superior device in almost every aspect. Its significantly better performance, display, camera, and charging speed justify the higher price for most users. The smoother user experience provided by the faster processor, higher refresh rate display, and ample RAM would be noticeable in daily use. While the Redmi A2 caters to a specific niche of budget-conscious buyers, the Edge 50 Fusion provides a well-rounded experience for a broader range of users. The longevity offered by the Edge 50 Fusion due to its superior hardware and software support also makes it a more future-proof investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.