Xiaomi Redmi A2+ vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 192 g 192 g
Height 164.9 mm 168 mm
Width 76.8 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2+Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1168 x 78 x 8.1Poco C65 slightly larger
Weight (g)192192Same weight
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality comparison impossible without details
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedPreference-dependent; side often more ergonomic
Display
Size (inches)6.526.74Poco C65 offers a larger viewing area
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1600Same resolution, but Poco C65 has slightly lower PPI due to larger size
Panel TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar visual experience expected, though Poco C65 specs indicate higher typical brightness (450 vs 400 nits) and high brightness mode (600 nits)
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Poco C65's 90Hz will provide smoother scrolling and animations
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)Poco C65 has a more powerful CPU and GPU, leading to better performance in demanding tasks and games
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco C65's CPU architecture is more modern and efficient
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2Poco C65's GPU offers significantly better graphics performance
RAM (GB)2/36/8Poco C65 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance
OSAndroid 12Android 13Poco C65 comes with a newer OS version, potentially offering more features and better optimization
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)8 MP + 0.3MP50MP + 2MP + 2MPPoco C65 boasts a much higher resolution main sensor, promising significantly better image quality. It also has dedicated Macro and depth sensors.
Front Camera (MP)5 MP8 MPPoco C65 has a higher resolution selfie camera
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsEquivalent video resolution. Poco C65 specs indicate 120fps slow-motion capability, not mentioned for Redmi A2+
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity
Charging10W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingPoco C65 charges faster
USBmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C 2.0Poco C65 uses the more modern and versatile USB-C port
Other
NFCNoYesPoco C65 supports contactless payments and data transfer

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price (based on "low price" range and lower specs).

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Helio G85 chipset, more RAM, and better GPU translate to a smoother user experience, especially for gaming and multitasking.
  • Improved camera: The 50MP main camera and dedicated macro/depth sensors will capture superior photos.
  • Larger and smoother display: The 6.74-inch screen with a 90Hz refresh rate provides a more immersive and responsive visual experience.
  • Faster charging: 18W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to 10W.
  • Modern connectivity: USB-C port and NFC enable faster data transfer, easier charging, and contactless payments.
  • Newer OS: Android 13 offers potential performance and feature advantages.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2+: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, social media) and light web browsing. Ideal for users with minimal performance needs.

Xiaomi Poco C65: Ideal for users who value performance, gaming, photography, and a smoother user experience. The larger display and faster charging are also beneficial for media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2+ is likely cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic communication vs. gaming, photography, media consumption.
  3. Do you prioritize performance and modern features? The Poco C65 excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, basic usage: Redmi A2+
  • Balanced budget, desire for good performance and camera: Poco C65

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco C65

While pricing information is incomplete, the Poco C65 offers substantial upgrades in performance, camera, display, and connectivity for a likely small price difference. The Helio G85, coupled with more RAM and a 90Hz display, delivers a noticeably better user experience. The 50MP camera and USB-C port are significant advantages. Unless budget is extremely tight, the Poco C65 offers far better value. Even if the Poco C65 is considerably more expensive, the performance and feature difference would make it worthwhile for most users beyond those seeking the absolute cheapest option.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.