Xiaomi Redmi A2+ vs vivo iQOO 12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 November 14, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 100.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 192 g 198.5 g
Height 164.9 mm 163.2 mm
Width 76.8 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1400 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 49.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2+vivo iQOO 12Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1iQOO 12 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)192198.5Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedMaterial differences impact durability and premium feel; information lacking here.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.78iQOO 12 offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001260 x 2800Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the iQOO 12.
TypeIPS LCDLTPO AMOLEDiQOO 12's AMOLED provides superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better battery efficiency due to LTPO.
Refresh RateUnspecified144HzHigher refresh rate on iQOO 12 results in smoother animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness400 nits (typ)3000 nits (peak)iQOO 12 is vastly brighter, ensuring better visibility outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)iQOO 12 boasts a significantly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking and demanding gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Massive performance difference; iQOO 12 handles demanding tasks with ease.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 750iQOO 12 offers a much more capable GPU for superior gaming and graphics performance.
RAM2GB/3GB12GB/16GBSubstantial difference in RAM; iQOO 12 allows for seamless multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP main, 0.3MP secondary50MP main, 50MP ultrawide, 64MP telephotoiQOO 12 boasts a significantly more versatile and higher resolution camera system with advanced features like optical zoom.
Front Camera5MP16MPHigher resolution selfie camera on iQOO 12.
Video Recording1080p@30fps8K@30fpsiQOO 12 capable of much higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities.
Charging10W fast charging120W fast chargingiQOO 12 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life (in specific use cases): The less powerful processor and lower resolution display might consume less power in basic tasks, leading to potentially longer battery life for less demanding usage.

vivo iQOO 12 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, more RAM, and a much more powerful GPU.
  • High-Quality Display: Larger, sharper AMOLED display with a high refresh rate.
  • Advanced Camera System: Versatile triple-camera setup with high resolution and optical zoom.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster charging speeds.
  • More Future-Proof: Newer Android version with longer OS update support, 5G connectivity, and more advanced features like NFC.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The iQOO 12 is significantly more expensive.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2+: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and light usage. Not recommended for gaming, demanding apps, or media consumption.

vivo iQOO 12: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, advanced camera capabilities, and fast charging. Ideal for gamers, power users, content creators, and those seeking a future-proof device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2+ is a budget phone, while the iQOO 12 is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks, gaming, media consumption.
  3. How important are features like camera quality, display quality, and performance?

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While the Redmi A2+ serves a specific niche for budget-conscious users with basic needs, the vivo iQOO 12 is the superior device overall. The significant performance difference, the vastly improved display and camera, faster charging, 5G connectivity, and future-proofing provided by the newer Android version and powerful hardware make it the clear winner. Even though the price difference is substantial, the iQOO 12 offers a far better user experience and long-term value. I prioritize a smooth and enjoyable user experience, future-proof features, and having a device capable of handling any task I throw at it. The iQOO 12 fulfills these needs much better.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.