Xiaomi Redmi A2+ vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g N/A
Weight 192 g 0 g
Height 164.9 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.8 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2+Tecno Spark Go 2024Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6Negligible size difference; both are large phones.
Weight (g)1920 (Missing data - cannot compare)Weight significantly impacts comfort during extended use. Missing data for Spark Go is crucial.
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedPersonal preference; side-mounted often considered more ergonomic when holding the phone.
USB TypemicroUSB 2.0USB Type-CSignificant advantage for Spark Go: Type-C offers faster data transfer and charging, plus reversible connector.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1612Nearly identical resolution; expect similar sharpness.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer good color reproduction and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Advantage for Spark Go: 90Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations, improving perceived performance.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Both entry-level chipsets, but benchmarks suggest the Unisoc T606 might offer slightly better performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Spark Go's CPU utilizes more powerful Cortex-A75 cores, potentially providing better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 generally considered more capable for gaming.
RAM2GB/3GB3GB/4GBMore RAM in Spark Go variants leads to better multitasking and app switching performance.
OSAndroid 12Android 13Advantage for Spark Go: Android 13 offers newer features, security updates, and potential performance optimizations.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP + 0.3MP13MP + 0.1MP (AI Lens)Advantage for Spark Go: Higher resolution main camera likely delivers better image quality. The secondary lens on both phones is essentially useless.
Front Camera5MP8MPAdvantage for Spark Go: Higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities. Spark Go advertises 120fps slow-motion, but resolution is unclear.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity, expect comparable battery life. Real-world usage will depend on software optimization.
Fast Charging10W10WSimilar charging speeds.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price (listed as "low price" vs. "medium price" for Spark Go).

Tecno Spark Go 2024 Advantages:

  • Performance: More powerful CPU and GPU, higher RAM options, newer Android version, and a 90Hz display contribute to a significantly smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Camera: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras potentially offer better image quality.
  • Connectivity: USB Type-C offers faster data transfer and charging.
  • Software: Newer Android version with longer software support lifespan.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2+: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality (calling, texting, web browsing) and long battery life. Suitable for light users or as a secondary device.

Tecno Spark Go 2024: Users seeking better performance, smoother display, improved camera quality, and modern conveniences like USB Type-C. Good for moderate gaming, social media, and content consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2+ is expected to be significantly cheaper.
  2. What is your primary use case? Light usage vs. gaming, multimedia, etc.
  3. How important is performance and future-proofing? The Spark Go offers a clear advantage in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: Redmi A2+
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Tecno Spark Go 2024

My Choice: Tecno Spark Go 2024

While the Redmi A2+ might be cheaper, the Spark Go 2024 offers a significantly better user experience due to its superior performance (CPU, GPU, RAM, 90Hz display), newer Android version, USB Type-C, and better camera system. The benefits of these features in day-to-day use outweigh the potential price difference for me. The lack of weight information for the Spark Go is concerning, but assuming a typical weight for its size, I'd still prioritize the overall performance and feature set.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.