Xiaomi Redmi A2+ vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 192 g 197 g
Height 164.9 mm 161 mm
Width 76.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2+Samsung Galaxy A25Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1161 x 76.5 x 8.3A25 is slightly smaller and thinner
Weight (g)192197Negligible weight difference
Build MaterialsUnspecifiedUnspecifiedMaterial differences unknown, impacting durability and premium feel
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDA25 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles
Display Size (inches)6.526.5Negligible size difference
Resolution (pixels)720 x 16001080 x 2340A25 has a much sharper and more detailed display
Refresh Rate (Hz)Unspecified120A25's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations
Peak Brightness (nits)400 (typ)1000 (HBM)A25 is much more usable in direct sunlight
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Exynos 1280 (5 nm)A25's 5nm chipset offers significantly better performance and power efficiency
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A25 has a more powerful and modern CPU architecture
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G68A25 offers much better gaming and graphics performance
RAM2/3 GB6/8 GBA25 provides significantly more memory for multitasking
OSAndroid 12Android 14A25 comes with a newer OS version, offering potential feature and security updates
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)8 MP + 0.3 MP50 MP + 8 MP + 2 MPA25 boasts a higher resolution main camera and additional lenses for versatility
Front Camera (MP)5 MP13 MPA25 offers a higher resolution selfie camera
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA25 can record videos at a much higher resolution
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity
Fast Charging10W25WA25 charges significantly faster

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Exynos 1280 chipset, more RAM, and faster GPU deliver a smoother and more responsive user experience for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Better Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, 120Hz refresh rate, and higher brightness offer a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, additional lenses (wide-angle and depth), and 4K video recording capabilities provide greater versatility and image quality.
  • Newer Software: Android 14 with longer OS update support ensures access to the latest features and security patches.
  • Faster Charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Galaxy A25 is significantly more expensive. The Redmi A2+ prioritizes affordability over performance and features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2+:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light web browsing. Suitable for first-time smartphone users or as a secondary device.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, social media browsing, basic app usage.

Samsung Galaxy A25:

  • Ideal User: Users who demand a smooth and responsive performance, a vibrant display, a versatile camera, and the latest software features. Suitable for gaming, content consumption, mobile photography, and multitasking.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, high-quality video streaming, mobile photography and videography, multitasking, using productivity apps.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2+ is a budget option, while the A25 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the A25 might be overkill. For demanding tasks and media consumption, the A25 is much better suited.
  3. How important are features like display quality, camera performance, and overall speed? The A25 significantly outperforms the A25 in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A25

While the Redmi A2+ offers an incredibly low price point, the Galaxy A25 provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior performance, vastly improved display, more versatile camera system, newer Android version, faster charging, and NFC functionality make it a much more compelling device for most users. The price difference is substantial, but the long-term benefits of a smoother, more feature-rich, and longer-lasting device justify the investment for me. The A25 would provide a much more enjoyable and frustration-free experience in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.