Xiaomi Redmi A2+ vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 192 g 182 g
Height 164.9 mm 162.4 mm
Width 76.8 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2+Oppo Reno11Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9Reno11 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)192182Reno11 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDReno11's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.526.7Reno11 provides a larger viewing area for media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2412Reno11 boasts significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzReno11's 120Hz refresh rate results in smoother animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness400 nits (typ)950 nits (peak)Reno11 will be much more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)Reno11's more modern and efficient chipset will deliver significantly better performance and potentially longer battery life.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Reno11 has a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster app loading, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G68 MC4Reno11's GPU provides a substantial boost in graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM2GB/3GB12GBReno11 offers vastly more RAM, enabling seamless multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP main, 0.3MP secondary50MP main, 8MP wide, 32MP telephotoReno11 offers significantly higher resolution, versatile lenses (wide and telephoto), and likely better image quality.
Front Camera5MP32MPReno11's front camera provides much higher resolution for selfies and video calls.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, up to 960fps slow-motionReno11 offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and slow-motion options.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4800 mAhSimilar battery capacities, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and hardware efficiency.
Charging10W fast charging67W fast chargingReno11 supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Oppo Reno11 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Much faster processor, GPU, and significantly more RAM.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, 120Hz refresh rate, higher brightness.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, versatile lenses, superior video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More Modern Features: NFC for contactless payments, USB Type-C port.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A2+: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light usage (calls, texting, browsing). Not recommended for gaming, demanding applications, or media consumption.

Oppo Reno11: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, a versatile camera system, and fast charging. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, multitasking, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2+ is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic use, the A2+ might suffice. For demanding tasks, the Reno11 is necessary.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize features like display quality, performance, camera, or battery life based on your needs.

My Choice: Oppo Reno11

While the Xiaomi Redmi A2+ offers an extremely budget-friendly option, the Oppo Reno11 is the clear winner for me. The superior performance, stunning AMOLED display with 120Hz, versatile camera system, and incredibly fast charging outweigh the price difference. The Reno11 offers a significantly better user experience across the board, making it a much more future-proof investment. While the A2+ might suit users with extremely limited budgets and basic needs, the Reno11 provides a modern smartphone experience that will satisfy most users for years to come. The difference in chipset technology (6nm vs 12nm) alone makes a huge difference in daily usability and battery life. I value a smooth and responsive experience, and the Reno11 delivers that in spades.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.