Xiaomi Redmi A2+ vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 192 g 171 g
Height 164.9 mm 154.1 mm
Width 76.8 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.4 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 19

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A2+Motorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1Edge 50 Neo is noticeably smaller and thinner, making it more pocketable.
Weight (g)192171Edge 50 Neo is lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedMaterial differences can impact durability and premium feel; information is lacking.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDLTPO P-OLEDEdge 50 Neo's OLED offers deeper blacks, richer colors, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Size (inches)6.526.36Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001256 x 2760Edge 50 Neo has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh RateUnspecified120HzEdge 50 Neo's 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness400 nits (typ)3000 nits (peak)Edge 50 Neo will be far more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)Edge 50 Neo's Dimensity 7300 offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to the smaller 4nm process.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Edge 50 Neo has a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G615 MC2Edge 50 Neo boasts a more capable GPU for enhanced gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM2/3GB12GBMassive difference in RAM. Edge 50 Neo will handle multitasking and demanding apps much better.
Storage32/64GB512GBEdge 50 Neo offers significantly more storage.
Camera
Rear Camera8MP Main, 0.3MP unspecified50MP Main, 13MP Wide, 10MP TelephotoEdge 50 Neo has a vastly superior camera system with higher resolution, wider lens options (wide and telephoto), and better sensor quality.
Front Camera5MP32MPEdge 50 Neo's front camera offers much higher resolution for better selfies and video calls.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsEdge 50 Neo supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4310 mAhRedmi A2+ has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, Edge 50 Neo's more efficient display and chipset could offset this difference.
Charging10W Fast Charging68W Fast Charging, 15W Wireless ChargingEdge 50 Neo charges significantly faster and offers convenient wireless charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity.
  • Lower Price: Budget-friendly option.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and ample RAM.
  • Higher Quality Display: Sharper, brighter OLED with 120Hz refresh rate.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, multiple lenses including telephoto.
  • Faster Charging & Wireless Charging: Convenience and time-saving.
  • More Modern Features: NFC, 5G connectivity, newer Android version.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi A2+: Compromises performance, display quality, and features for a lower price.
  • Edge 50 Neo: Slightly smaller battery capacity, higher price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Redmi A2+:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and long battery life. Less demanding users who don't play games or use demanding applications.
  • Use Cases: Basic phone calls, texting, web browsing, social media (light usage).

Edge 50 Neo:

  • Ideal User: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, a versatile camera, and modern features like 5G and NFC. Users who multitask, play games, and consume media.
  • Use Cases: Gaming, media consumption (videos, photos), multitasking, mobile photography, demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2+ is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks and media consumption.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Battery life, performance, display quality, camera capabilities.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Redmi A2+
  • Balanced Needs, Moderate Budget: Consider other mid-range options (information not provided).
  • Performance, Features, and Premium Experience: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

While the Redmi A2+ offers a lower price and potentially longer battery life, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior performance, stunning display, versatile camera system, faster charging, and modern features like NFC and 5G make it a far more compelling device for most users. The price difference is justified by the substantial upgrades across the board. Even if battery life is slightly shorter, the fast 68W charging mitigates that concern effectively. For me, a smoother, more responsive phone with a great screen and camera outweighs a slightly larger battery capacity.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.