Xiaomi Redmi A1+ vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 23, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 115.25 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 192 g 189 g
Height 164.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Light Green
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.39 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Redmi A1+ and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. These two budget-friendly contenders are vying for your attention, but which one truly delivers on a daily basis? Let's break down their specs, see how they fare in real-world scenarios, and figure out who they're best suited for.

1. Specifications Breakdown

First, let's get down to the nitty-gritty with a detailed look at each phone's specifications. I've organized them into practical categories and included real-world implications to make things crystal clear.

FeatureXiaomi Redmi A1+ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmSlightly different sizes, both are comfortable in hand. A75 slightly thinner and lighter.
Weight192g189gMinimal weight difference; both are lightweight enough for comfortable handling.
BuildStandardStandardBoth phones have a standard, non-foldable form factor.
Display
Size6.52"6.6"Similar screen sizes, A75 offers a bit more screen real estate for content consumption.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1612Basic HD+ resolution for both; suitable for everyday use, but not the sharpest.
Pixel Density269 PPI267 PPISimilar sharpness; both will look acceptable but won't be as crisp as higher-resolution screens.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer decent viewing angles and color reproduction, typical for IPS LCDs.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzA75's 90Hz offers slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsLimited visibility outdoors on sunny days; could be hard to see in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Helio A22Unisoc T606Different chipsets; T606 in A75 is significantly more powerful leading to a much smoother experience.
AnTuTu Score95,000240,000A75 significantly outperforms the A1+ in processing power, leading to faster loading and multitasking.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1A75's GPU handles graphics more efficiently, leading to smoother gaming and better overall experience.
Camera
Main Camera Res.8MP50MPA75's 50MP main camera captures much more detail; better for everyday photos.
Main Camera Aperturef/2.0f/1.8A75's wider aperture allows more light, better in low-light environments.
Selfie Camera Res.5MP8MPA75's 8MP selfie camera will likely capture better detail than the A1+ 5MP.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsStandard 1080p recording for social media sharing; decent for casual videos.
Camera FeaturesBasicAdvancedA75 has additional PDAF and Digital Image Stabilization, improving focus and clarity.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities, both should last a full day with moderate use.
Charging10W22.5WA75 charges significantly faster, reducing wait times.
Battery TypeLi-IonLi-PolymerStandard battery technologies; both are non-removable.
Software
OSAndroid 12Android 13A75 comes with a newer version of Android, usually meaning better performance and efficiency, updated software.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11n802.11acA75 supports 5GHz WiFi, offering faster speeds and better connectivity.
Bluetooth5.05.0Standard Bluetooth; both support common audio features.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoA75 has better satellite support for more accurate location tracking.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth support dual SIMs for personal and work use.
Storage
Internal32 GB128/256 GBA75 offers considerably more storage for apps, media and files.
RAM2 GB4/8 GBA75 provides much better multitasking capabilities, especially the 8 GB version.
ExpandableNoNoNeither offer expandable storage
Audio
QualityBasicDTS / DTS XA75 offers better audio enhancements with DTS / DTS X
Security
FingerprintRear-mountedSide-mountedA75's side-mounted sensor is generally faster and more convenient.
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Proximity, Fingerprint, Ultrasonic Proximity VirtualAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintA75 has the added benefit of a Gyroscope, enhancing some apps and gaming.

2. Key Insights

Xiaomi Redmi A1+ Strengths:

  • Basic Budget Functionality: The Redmi A1+ is designed for users who need a simple, reliable phone for basic tasks.
  • Decent Battery Life: The 5000mAh battery will get you through a day of average use.

Xiaomi Redmi A1+ Limitations:

  • Underpowered Processor: The Helio A22 struggles with multitasking and resource-intensive apps.
  • Low Internal Storage: 32 GB is very limiting for today's average use.
  • Limited RAM: 2 GB RAM can cause slowdowns when switching between apps.
  • Basic Camera: The camera is pretty basic with only 8MP and low light capabilities.
  • Older Android Version: Android 12 is not the latest version, meaning less security and updates.
  • Slow Charging: The 10W charging is quite slow, taking longer to fully charge the device.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Strengths:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Unisoc T606 chipset is much more powerful and delivers a smoother user experience.
  • Larger Storage: Much larger storage capacity (128 or 256 GB) is great for media and apps.
  • More RAM: The option for 4 or 8 GB of RAM allows for smoother multitasking and less lag.
  • Higher Quality Camera: The 50MP main camera and 8MP selfie camera offer significantly better image quality.
  • Faster Charging: 22.5W fast charging means less time plugged into the wall.
  • Newer Android Version: Android 13 comes with better features, security, and overall optimization.
  • 90Hz Refresh Rate: The display offers a more fluid experience compared to the 60Hz display of the Redmi A1+.
  • Gyroscope: Added Gyroscope enables features for games and apps.
  • Better audio: DTS/DTS X enhances the audio quality compared to the basic audio features on the A1+.
  • More Connectivity: Supports faster WiFi and more accurate GPS.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Limitations:

  • Non-Expandable Storage: You're stuck with the internal storage that you choose.

Overall: The ZTE Blade A75 4G is clearly the superior phone, offering better performance, storage, camera, software, and charging capabilities. The Redmi A1+ is more for users who are willing to compromise a lot to save money and don't need anything too fancy.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi A1+:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those who need the absolute cheapest option for basic smartphone functions.
  • First-Time Smartphone Users: Suitable for individuals who are new to smartphones and only use them for simple tasks.
  • Users with Minimal Needs: Users who need a backup phone or do not use smartphones regularly.
  • Specific Use Cases: Basic calling, texting, very light app usage, and emergency purposes.

ZTE Blade A75 4G:

  • Value Seekers: Users who want the most performance and features for their money in a budget phone.
  • Casual Gamers: Those who enjoy basic mobile gaming and want smoother performance.
  • Social Media Users: Perfect for those who take photos and videos for social media.
  • Daily Users: For users who want a phone that can handle everyday tasks smoothly.
  • Specific Use Cases: Social media browsing, photography, light gaming, and daily app usage.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. How important is performance and speed to you? If you want smooth app loading, multitasking, and basic gaming, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is essential. If you are just using it for basic tasks, the Redmi A1+ is ok but you will experience lags at times.
  2. How much storage do you need, and do you plan to take photos and videos? If you need lots of space for apps and photos, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the clear winner, plus it has a better camera for photos and videos.
  3. What is your budget and are you willing to compromise on features for price? If the absolute lowest price is the highest priority, the Redmi A1+ is the only choice, but you will sacrifice performance, storage, and a better camera.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Minimalist User: If you simply need a phone for calls and texts, the Redmi A1+ is adequate.
  • Scenario 2: Value Seeker: If you want the best bang for your buck, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the clear winner with better performance, camera, charging speed, storage, and newer software.
  • Scenario 3: Light Social Media/Gamer: If you intend to use social media and light gaming the ZTE Blade A75 4G is more capable for smooth performance.

My Choice:

If I were choosing between these two, I would absolutely go with the ZTE Blade A75 4G. The differences are just too significant to ignore. The drastically improved processing power, significantly larger storage options, better camera, faster charging, and newer Android version make it a much more enjoyable and functional phone. The 90Hz display and DTS/DTS X audio are also welcomed additions. Even if it costs slightly more than the Redmi A1+, the increase in performance and features makes it worth the investment. The Redmi A1+ feels like too much of a compromise for today's smartphone users and the A75 is a much better option.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.