Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 18, 2021 August 9, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 120.44 cm³ 110.64 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 198 g 205 g
Height 162.3 mm 164 mm
Width 77.3 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.6 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Gray
  • Ocean Green
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Twilight Blue
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 82.1 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 140.71 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.82 mAh/cm³ 45.19 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Exynos 850 (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G52

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the key specifications for the Xiaomi Redmi 9T and Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho, including their practical implications:

Design

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9TSamsung Galaxy A12 NachoPractical Impact
Dimensions162.3 × 77.3 × 9.6 mm164 × 75.8 × 8.9 mmThe Redmi 9T is slightly wider and thicker, while the A12 Nacho is taller. Differences are minimal, but the Redmi 9T has a larger overall volume.
Weight198g205gThe Redmi 9T is slightly lighter, potentially offering a more comfortable experience during prolonged use.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9TSamsung Galaxy A12 NachoPractical Impact
Size6.53"6.5"Both have similar screen sizes, resulting in comparable viewing areas.
Resolution1080x2340720x1600The Redmi 9T has a much sharper display, with text and images appearing clearer.
PPI395270The higher pixel density of the Redmi 9T leads to a more detailed and less pixelated viewing experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDPLS LCDIPS LCD offers generally better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to PLS LCD, enhancing the overall display quality of the Redmi 9T.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth phones have a standard 60Hz refresh rate, meaning similar smoothness in scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness is identical, although this specific value is incorrect and should be updated with actual measurements for a meaningful comparison.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9TSamsung Galaxy A12 NachoPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)Exynos 850 (8 nm)The Exynos 850 has a smaller manufacturing process, which is usually more power-efficient. The Snapdragon 662 has better benchmark results indicating better performance.
AnTuTu Score174,500117,300The Redmi 9T is expected to provide significantly smoother performance for daily tasks, app loading, and moderate gaming.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G52The Adreno 610 GPU in the Redmi 9T is generally more powerful and will offer better gaming capabilities.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9TSamsung Galaxy A12 NachoPractical Impact
Main Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", S5KGM148MP, f/2.0The Redmi 9T's wider aperture (f/1.79) should result in better low-light performance and shallower depth of field. Sensor size isn't available for A12 Nacho.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.0, 1.12 µm pixel size8MP, f/2.2The Redmi 9T has a slightly wider aperture for better low-light selfies. Pixel size isn't available for A12 Nacho.
Wide Angle8MP, f/2.2, 1/4", OV88565MP, f/2.2The Redmi 9T's wide-angle lens offers higher resolution for more detailed wide shots.
Portrait Mode2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Similar depth cameras, so comparable portrait mode quality.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Comparable macro lenses for close-up photography.
Video1080p@30fps, 120fps slow-mo1080p@30fps, 34fps slow-moBoth record at 1080p, but the Redmi 9T offers better slow-motion capture
Features4K video, digital zoom, digital image stabilization, manual focus, panorama, HDR, etc.Digital zoom, PDAF, HDR, etc.The Redmi 9T offers more advanced video features, including 4K, image stabilization and manual focus, while the Samsung has Phase Detection Autofocus for quicker focus in photos.

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9TSamsung Galaxy A12 NachoPractical Impact
Capacity6000mAh5000mAhThe Redmi 9T has a significantly larger battery, which will likely translate to much longer battery life between charges.
Charging18W Fast Charging, Li-Ion Polymer15W Fast Charging, Li-IonThe Redmi 9T charges slightly faster due to the 18W charging, potentially reducing charging times.
FeaturesReverse charging, 22.5W charger includedNon-removableThe Redmi 9T can act as a power bank for other devices. The faster charger included in the box is also an advantage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Here are the major advantages of each phone:

Xiaomi Redmi 9T Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution and pixel density result in a much sharper and clearer visual experience.
  • Better Performance: The Snapdragon 662 chipset and Adreno 610 GPU offer better overall performance for daily tasks and gaming.
  • Larger Battery: The 6000mAh battery offers significantly longer battery life.
  • Faster Charging: Supports 18W charging and includes a 22.5W charger in the box.
  • Better Audio: Includes Hi-Res Audio and Stereo Speakers.
  • More Camera Features: 4K Video recording, digital image stabilization, and manual focus options.
  • Reverse Charging: Can be used as a power bank.
  • Screen Protection: Features Corning Gorilla Glass 3 for better scratch resistance.
  • Wider Aperture on Main and Selfie Camera: Better low light photography performance.

Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho Advantages:

  • Newer OS Out of Box: Launches with Android 11 (and upgradeable to Android 13) out of the box compared to Android 10 on Redmi 9T.
  • Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF): Can offer faster focus for photos compared to contrast-based focus.

Trade-offs:

  • The Redmi 9T offers better performance, display quality and battery life, but at the cost of a slightly thicker design.
  • The Galaxy A12 Nacho has a slightly more modern OS out of the box, but falls short in other important aspects compared to the Redmi 9T.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 9T:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize battery life, display quality, performance for daily tasks, media consumption, and basic mobile gaming.
  • Use Cases:
    • Watching videos and movies with a sharper, more vibrant display.
    • Playing games smoothly with less lag.
    • Extended use without worrying about battery drain.
    • Taking decent photos and videos with more flexibility and features.
    • Users that like to listen to music with good quality sound.
  • Value: The Redmi 9T offers excellent value for users seeking performance and features on a budget.

Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho:

  • Ideal User: Users who are looking for a basic phone with a familiar Samsung user interface and prioritize up to date software.
  • Use Cases:
    • Basic smartphone use, such as browsing, social media, and calling.
    • Users who like to take pictures with phase detection autofocus.
  • Value: The A12 Nacho offers a basic experience that is slightly less powerful but has newer software.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions for buyers to consider:

  1. How important is display quality and performance to you? If you want a sharper screen and smoother overall operation, the Redmi 9T is the better choice.
  2. How long do you need your battery to last? If you value battery life, the larger battery of the Redmi 9T is a significant advantage.
  3. Do you need more advanced camera features? If you want more control over your photography and video recordings, the Redmi 9T offers additional features.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Heavy Media Consumption and Gaming: The Xiaomi Redmi 9T is the clear winner due to its superior display, better performance, larger battery, and better audio.
  • Scenario 2: Basic User with Familiar Samsung UI: The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho may be suitable if a familiar OneUI interface is preferred, although the overall performance and features are not as competitive.
  • Scenario 3: Best Value for Performance: The Xiaomi Redmi 9T provides the best value, offering superior performance, features, and battery life compared to the Samsung A12 Nacho.

What I would choose and why!

I would choose the Xiaomi Redmi 9T. While both phones are budget-friendly options, the Redmi 9T offers a significantly better experience in key areas such as:

  • Display Quality: The higher resolution and pixel density make a noticeable difference in everyday use, making text and images much sharper.
  • Performance: The Snapdragon 662 chipset is more powerful for day-to-day tasks and light gaming.
  • Battery Life: The larger battery capacity ensures I wouldn't have to worry about running out of power during the day.
  • Camera Features: 4K Video, manual focus and digital image stabilization offer more flexibility for content creation.

The Samsung A12 Nacho's newer software is a plus, but the Redmi 9T's superior performance, display, and battery life are more critical for the overall user experience. The inclusion of a faster charger, reverse charging, and better audio make the Redmi 9T a more compelling device for most users. The Redmi 9T offers better value for its price.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.