Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 12, 2020 May 13, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 114.28 cm³ 100.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 196 g 204 g
Height 164.9 mm 163.3 mm
Width 77 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Gray
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Twilight Blue
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.8 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.26 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.75 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.9 × 77 × 9 mm, 196g163.3 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm, 204gRedmi 9C is slightly larger and lighter, might be easier to handle for some, while Axon 40 Ultra feels more premium.
FoldableStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones, no difference in form factor.
Display
Size6.53"6.8"Axon 40 Ultra offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution720x16001116x2480Axon 40 Ultra has significantly sharper and more detailed visuals, enhancing clarity for text, images, and videos.
PPI269400Axon 40 Ultra provides much crisper images and text, reducing eye strain, especially for reading or detailed work.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDAxon 40 Ultra offers better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, leading to a more immersive visual experience.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzAxon 40 Ultra provides smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming visuals, resulting in a more responsive and fluid user interface.
Brightness0 nits1500 nitsAxon 40 Ultra is much easier to see outdoors in bright sunlight, providing better visibility for navigation and other outdoor activities.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G35 (12 nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Axon 40 Ultra delivers significantly faster performance, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
AnTuTu Score110,4901,061,300Axon 40 Ultra handles demanding apps and games with ease, while Redmi 9C may struggle with heavier tasks.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 730Axon 40 Ultra provides much better graphics performance for gaming and other graphically intensive applications.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery life under similar usage conditions.
Charging10W65WAxon 40 Ultra charges much faster, reducing downtime and allowing for quick power top-ups.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.264MP, f/1.6Axon 40 Ultra captures much more detailed and higher-quality photos, especially in low light, due to larger sensor and wider aperture.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.0Axon 40 Ultra takes sharper and more detailed selfies.
Telephoto LensN/A64MP, f/3.5Axon 40 Ultra allows for optical zoom capabilities, capturing distant subjects with better clarity.
Wide Angle CameraN/A64MP, f/2.3Axon 40 Ultra captures wider scenes, useful for landscape photography and group shots.
Video1080p@30fps8K@30fps, 4K@120fpsAxon 40 Ultra records much higher-resolution videos with advanced features like HDR and EIS.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 12 (upgradeable to 13)Axon 40 Ultra has a more modern operating system with newer features and security updates.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/nWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Axon 40 Ultra supports faster and more stable Wi-Fi connections, especially on modern networks.
Bluetooth5.05.2Axon 40 Ultra offers slightly improved Bluetooth performance and efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoAxon 40 Ultra offers more accurate location tracking due to more supported satellite systems.
Storage
Internal32/64/128GB128/256/512/1024GBAxon 40 Ultra offers significantly more storage space for apps, media, and files.
RAM2/3/4GB8/12/16/18GBAxon 40 Ultra allows for smoother multitasking and running of demanding applications.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage, requiring users to rely solely on internal memory.
AudioBasicStereo Speakers, DTS/DTS XAxon 40 Ultra offers a better audio experience with stereo speakers and surround sound support.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Likely significantly more affordable.
  • Lighter Weight: Slightly lighter, which some users may prefer for portability.

Practical Implications:

  • The Redmi 9C is a budget-friendly option for basic smartphone use.
  • It's suitable for users who prioritize affordability over performance and advanced features.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, 120Hz refresh rate, and higher brightness.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful chipset and GPU.
  • Advanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, telephoto lens, wide-angle lens, and 8K video recording.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging.
  • More Modern Software: Android 12 (upgradeable to 13).
  • Enhanced Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, and more comprehensive GPS support.
  • Significantly More Storage and RAM: Larger internal storage and more RAM.
  • Better Audio: Stereo speakers with DTS/DTS X support.

Practical Implications:

  • The Axon 40 Ultra delivers a flagship-level experience with top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a versatile camera system.
  • Ideal for users who demand the best possible performance, features, and overall user experience.

Trade-offs:

  • The Axon 40 Ultra is likely considerably more expensive than the Redmi 9C.
  • Axon 40 Ultra is heavier.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 9C:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, first-time smartphone buyers, or those needing a secondary phone for basic communication and light use.
  • Use Cases:
    • Making calls and sending text messages.
    • Browsing social media and basic web surfing.
    • Simple photography and video recording.
  • Price-to-Value: Good value for users with very limited budgets and basic needs.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:

  • Ideal User: Tech enthusiasts, power users, content creators, and anyone who wants a premium smartphone experience.
  • Use Cases:
    • High-end mobile gaming.
    • Professional photography and videography.
    • Demanding multitasking and productivity tasks.
    • Immersive media consumption.
  • Price-to-Value: High value for users who are willing to pay for top-tier performance and features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 9C is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks.
  3. How important are display quality and camera performance to you? The Axon 40 Ultra excels in both.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Student on a tight budget: Redmi 9C provides essential smartphone functionality at a minimal cost.
  • Scenario 2: Mobile gamer and content creator: Axon 40 Ultra offers the performance, display, and camera capabilities required.
  • Scenario 3: User prioritizing camera quality above all else: Axon 40 Ultra's advanced camera system is a clear winner.

What I Would Choose and Why

I would choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. While the price difference is significant, the overall user experience offered by the Axon 40 Ultra is vastly superior. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, combined with ample RAM, would provide a smooth and lag-free experience for all my daily tasks, including heavy multitasking and gaming. The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate would make everything from browsing the web to watching videos a joy, and the superior camera system would allow me to capture high-quality photos and videos. For me, the performance, camera quality, and display are worth the extra cost, as they significantly enhance the overall smartphone experience and allow me to be more productive and creative on the go.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.